How Is Initial Velocity Calculated in Kinetic Friction Problems?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial velocity of a skier who comes to rest after sliding a distance of 29 m on snow, with a known coefficient of kinetic friction. Participants explore the application of the Work Energy Theorem and the role of friction in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the Work Energy Theorem and its application, questioning how to calculate work done by friction without knowing the mass of the skier. There are attempts to derive equations relating initial velocity to other known quantities, and some participants express confusion about algebraic manipulations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, emphasizing the importance of calculating work done by friction and equating it to kinetic energy. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem and the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the absence of mass as a constraint in the calculations, while others clarify that the skier is not on an incline, which may affect the understanding of forces at play.

IAmSparticus
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
1. A skier slides horizontally along the snow for a distance of 29 m before coming to rest. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the skier and the snow is µk = 0.010. Initially, how fast was the skier going?


2. f kinetic = Coeff. of friction * Normal Force
Work Energy Theorem = (1/2 mass * Final Velocity^2)-(1/2 mass * Initial Velocity^2)



3. In the WET, the masses cancel out, I get an equation of Initial Velocity^2= 2Final Velocity ^2.

Only problem is the final velocity is zero so I get an initial velocity of zero as well, but that's is impossible...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, "Work Energy Theorem" is the name of a theorem, not some physical quantity, so it makes no sense to write, work energy theorem = 'blah.' The work energy theorem is a theorem which *states* that:

work done = change in kinetic energy.

And no, you don't get an equation which states that initial velocity^2 = final velocity^2. You should be more careful with your algebra.

If

W = 1/2m(v_f)^2 - 1/2m(v_i)^2)

then you get the result that:

m* [ (v_f)^2 - (v_i)^2 ] = 2W

and since v_f = 0,

m*(v_i)^2 = 2W

You know that in this case, the work (W) was being done by friction, which allows you to calculate it.
 
So how would I calculate it without the mass? We know how far it travels and the coefficient of Kinetic Friction, but not the mass.
 
How would you calculate W, the work done by friction? That will make the answer to your question clear.
 
Two accelerations are acting on the skier. They are in the opposite direction. One due to gravitation, and another due to friction. Find the net acceleration. Using kinematic equation, find the initial velocity.
 
Work is equal to force times displacement, and the force of friction is equal to the coefficient of kinetic friction times the normal force (which is equal to mass times gravity). But I'm still confused how I would get it without having the mass.

And thank you for helping me out, I'm really struggling with this stuff and my algebra isn't that great...
 
rl.bhat said:
Two accelerations are acting on the skier. They are in the opposite direction. One due to gravitation, and another due to friction. Find the net acceleration. Using kinematic equation, find the initial velocity.

No, the skier is not on an incline. Try not to confuse the OP. The skier is merely being decelerated to rest from some initial velocity due to a frictional force. To find the initial velocity, all the OP has to do is calculate the work done by friction and equate it to the initial KE. That's it.
 
IAmSparticus said:
Work is equal to force times displacement, and the force of friction is equal to the coefficient of kinetic friction times the normal force (which is equal to mass times gravity).

Exactly right. The mass appears in the expression for the work done as well. Which is why it cancels from both sides of the equation.
 
cepheid said:
No, the skier is not on an incline. Try not to confuse the OP. The skier is merely being decelerated to rest from some initial velocity due to a frictional force. To find the initial velocity, all the OP has to do is calculate the work done by friction and equate it to the initial KE. That's it.
Sorry.
 
  • #10
Work is equal to force times displacement, and the force of friction is equal to the coefficient of kinetic friction times the normal force (which is equal to mass times gravity).

So the equation would look like m*(v_i)^2 = 2 (m * g) but then since the masses cancel, the equation would then be Vi^2 = 2 g?
 
  • #11
IAmSparticus said:
Work is equal to force times displacement, and the force of friction is equal to the coefficient of kinetic friction times the normal force (which is equal to mass times gravity).

So the equation would look like m*(v_i)^2 = 2 (m * g) but then since the masses cancel, the equation would then be Vi^2 = 2 g?

Don't forget the coefficient of kinetic friction (mu) on the right hand side, as well as the displacement. You definitely have the right idea though.
 
  • #12
So Vi = Square root (2*g*Coeff. of friction*displacement)?

Which I get to be Vi = Square root (5.684) which equals 2.384 m/s?
 
  • #13
IAmSparticus said:
So Vi = Square root (2*g*Coeff. of friction*displacement)?

Which I get to be Vi = Square root (5.684) which equals 2.384 m/s?
How did you get the equation - Vi= Square root (2*g*Coeff. of friction*displacement?
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K