How Is St Venant's Torsion Constant Calculated for Non-Standard Steel Sections?

  • Thread starter Thread starter derryck1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Torsion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

St Venant's torsion constant (J) for non-standard steel sections is calculated using methods from advanced strength of materials, often involving finite element analysis. For thin-walled cross sections, approximate formulas are available, particularly for open sections like I-beams. A recommended formula for calculating J is J = (1/3)*(bTF*tTF^3 + dweb*tweb^3 + bBF*tTF^3), where b represents the longer side of the section. For accurate results, especially when the ratio of b to t is not significantly large, additional factors from tables may be applied.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of St Venant's torsion constant
  • Familiarity with finite element analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of structural steel design principles
  • Basic proficiency in using engineering formulas for cross-sectional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study finite element modeling techniques for torsional analysis
  • Research advanced strength of materials textbooks focusing on torsion
  • Explore the use of tables for torsion constant adjustments based on b/t ratios
  • Review the provided technical document on torsion properties from CISC
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, particularly those working with non-standard steel sections, and students in advanced strength of materials courses will benefit from this discussion.

derryck1234
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello

I am a Junior Structural engineer and need to know how St Venant's torsion constant is calculated. It appears in structural steel tables, but without knowing how to calculate it, I cannot find its value for non-standard steel sections.

Please, can somebody help.

Regards

Derryck
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is a topic which is covered in advanced strength of materials courses. The general calculation of J for an arbitrary cross-section involves solving a partial differential equation, usually by means of a finite element method.

For thin-wall cross sections, various approximate formulas and methods have been developed to calculate J for closed and open sections. These methods are usually covered in texts dealing with aircraft or ship structures.

For open sections of the type usually found in construction, the formulas in the attached article may be used:

http://www.cisc-icca.ca/files/technical/techdocs/updates/torsionprop.pdf
 
This might help. http://www.cisc-icca.ca/files/technical/techdocs/updates/torsionprop.pdf

Bear in mind that the mathematical notion of a torsion constant is only an approximation to the real behavior of the object (except for circular sections) and the formulas for complicated shapes are approximate.

One might hope that the values quoted in structural steel tables for standard sections were validated against measurements, not just calculated theoretically, so don't worry too much the formulas don't give exactly the same values as the tables.

If the shape of your non-standard sections don't match any of the formulas, probably the easiest way would be to make a finite element model of a length of section, apply some loads to twist it, and find the displacements.

EDIT: That must be a good reference if two people recommended it independently :smile:
 
If you have an open section (e.g. I-beam, parallel flanged changed, equal angle i.e. with a closed flow of shear flows within the walls of a section) this formula will give you a good enough approximation:

J = bt^3/3 where b is the always the longer side. e.g. for a rectanngle

J = breadth * depth^3/3

For an I-beam or indeed other section you can simply add all the bt^3/3 i.e. for an I-beam,

J = (1/3)*(bTF*tTF^3+dweb*tweb^3 + bBF*tTF^3)

It should be noted that the formulaa begins to break down where b isn't >> t. To get a better approximate there are various tables that give you a factor k to multiply the torsion constant with that's a function of b/t
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K