How Is the Abelianization of a Lie Group Defined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Lie groups
Click For Summary
The abelianization of a group G is defined as the quotient G/[G,G], where [G,G] is the commutator subgroup. For Lie groups, the commutator subgroup is formed by elements obtained through finite sequences of commutators and their inverses, maintaining the analytic nature of group operations. An example discussed is the group of roto-translations in the 2D plane, where the commutator subgroup corresponds to the subgroup of translations. This leads to the conclusion that the abelianization of this group is isomorphic to the subgroup of rotations. The relationship between Lie subgroups and smooth manifolds is also highlighted, emphasizing the smooth action of G on the coset space G/H.
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,

the abelianization of a group G is given by the quotient G/[G,G], where [G,G] is the commutator subgroup of G. When dealing with finite groups, the commutator subgroup is given by the (normal) subgroup generated by all the commutators of G.

If we consider instead the case of G being a Lie group, how do we abelianize it? In particular, do we define the commutator subgroup of a Lie group G in the standard way, as all the elements of G obtained by finite sequences of commutators and their inverses?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. It is still a group and group operations are analytic.
 
  • Like
Likes mnb96
Alright, thanks.
As an exercise I tried to consider the group G=RT of roto-translations on the 2D plane (which is a non-abelian group) and if my calculations are correct, the commutator subgroup of G turns out to be exactly the subgroup T of translations. Interesting.
From this I shall probably deduce that the abelianization of the group of roto-translation is isomorphic to the subgroup R of rotations.
 
Generally when you have a Lie subgroup, H, then the coset space G/H, is a smooth manifold and the action of G on G/H is itself smooth.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
533
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
528
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
860
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
882
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K