How Is the Enthalpy of Formation for Lithium Fluoride Calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the enthalpy of formation for lithium fluoride (LiF) using various thermodynamic values. Key equations include lithium sublimation, ionization, fluorine bond dissociation, and electron affinity, with the lattice energy of LiF being a crucial factor. A participant initially calculates the enthalpy of formation as -537 kJ but realizes the correct value is -617 kJ after considering the need to account for bond dissociation of F2 correctly. The importance of consistent sign usage in thermodynamic calculations is emphasized, particularly regarding energy release when forming LiF. Ultimately, the confusion is resolved by recognizing the need to adjust the calculations to reflect the formation of one LiF molecule from two fluorine atoms.
Lori

Homework Statement


calculate enthalpy of formation for lithium fluoride... LiF

Homework Equations


Given from the worksheet is:

Lithium sublimation = 129 kj/mol
Lithium first ionization = 520 kj/mol
bond-dissociation energy of fluorine is 159 kj/mol F2
electron affinity for fluorine is -328 kj/mol
lattice energy of LiF = -1047 kj/mol


The Attempt at a Solution


The chemical equations i wrote/figured out are:

Li(s) -> Li(g) 159 kj
Li(g) -> Li+(g) + e- 520 kj
1/2F2(g) - > F(g) -159 kj
F(g) + e- -> F-(g) -328 kj
Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) -1047

When i added it all up to find enthalpy formation , i get -537 kj but the answer is -617. what did i do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Lori!

Shouldn't we have F2(g) - > 2F(g) -159 kJ, so that it only costs half?
And shouldn't Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) have a positive energy that is released when we bring oppositely charged particles together?
And shouldn't F(g) + e- -> F-(g) have a positive energy as well, since the electron bonds naturally?
We should be consistent with the minus signs, shouldn't we? :rolleyes:
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Lori!

Shouldn't we have F2(g) - > 2F(g) -159 kJ, so that it only costs half?
And shouldn't Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) have a positive energy that is released when we bring oppositely charged particles together?
And shouldn't F(g) + e- -> F-(g) have a positive energy as well, since the electron bonds naturally?
We should be consistent with the minus signs, shouldn't we? :rolleyes:
I'm confused why there sublimation would cost half though ;(
 
Lori said:
I'm confused why there sublimation would cost half though ;(
Aren't we talking about the bond-dissociation energy of F2?
 
I like Serena said:
Aren't we talking about the bond-dissociation energy of F2?
Oops I meant the bond dissociation . Yeah
 
Lori said:
Oops I meant the bond dissociation . Yeah

Isn't bond dissociation for F2, leaving us with 2 F atoms?
We can make 2 LiF with that.
So the cost for 1 LiF is half of that.
 
  • Like
Likes Lori
I like Serena said:
Isn't bond dissociation for F2, leaving us with 2 F atoms?
We can make 2 LiF with that.
So the cost for 1 LiF is half of that.
Oh it makes sense now. It's cause we only needed 1 so I took one half of the F so I should also take one half of the cost
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
4K