How Is the Enthalpy of Formation for Lithium Fluoride Calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The enthalpy of formation for lithium fluoride (LiF) is calculated using several thermodynamic values, including lithium sublimation (129 kJ/mol), lithium first ionization (520 kJ/mol), bond-dissociation energy of fluorine (159 kJ/mol for F2), electron affinity for fluorine (-328 kJ/mol), and lattice energy of LiF (-1047 kJ/mol). The correct calculation involves adjusting the bond-dissociation energy to account for the formation of two fluorine atoms from F2, which results in a total enthalpy of formation of -617 kJ/mol. The discussion highlights the importance of consistent sign usage in thermodynamic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, specifically enthalpy and energy changes.
  • Familiarity with chemical equations and stoichiometry.
  • Knowledge of lattice energy concepts in ionic compounds.
  • Basic understanding of electron affinity and ionization energy.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of lattice energy for ionic compounds using the Born-Haber cycle.
  • Learn about the significance of bond-dissociation energy in chemical reactions.
  • Explore the concept of electron affinity and its role in ionic bond formation.
  • Investigate the thermodynamic properties of other ionic compounds for comparative analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in thermodynamics and ionic compound formation will benefit from this discussion.

Lori

Homework Statement


calculate enthalpy of formation for lithium fluoride... LiF

Homework Equations


Given from the worksheet is:

Lithium sublimation = 129 kj/mol
Lithium first ionization = 520 kj/mol
bond-dissociation energy of fluorine is 159 kj/mol F2
electron affinity for fluorine is -328 kj/mol
lattice energy of LiF = -1047 kj/mol


The Attempt at a Solution


The chemical equations i wrote/figured out are:

Li(s) -> Li(g) 159 kj
Li(g) -> Li+(g) + e- 520 kj
1/2F2(g) - > F(g) -159 kj
F(g) + e- -> F-(g) -328 kj
Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) -1047

When i added it all up to find enthalpy formation , i get -537 kj but the answer is -617. what did i do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Lori!

Shouldn't we have F2(g) - > 2F(g) -159 kJ, so that it only costs half?
And shouldn't Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) have a positive energy that is released when we bring oppositely charged particles together?
And shouldn't F(g) + e- -> F-(g) have a positive energy as well, since the electron bonds naturally?
We should be consistent with the minus signs, shouldn't we? :rolleyes:
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Lori!

Shouldn't we have F2(g) - > 2F(g) -159 kJ, so that it only costs half?
And shouldn't Li+(g) + F-(g) -> LiF(s) have a positive energy that is released when we bring oppositely charged particles together?
And shouldn't F(g) + e- -> F-(g) have a positive energy as well, since the electron bonds naturally?
We should be consistent with the minus signs, shouldn't we? :rolleyes:
I'm confused why there sublimation would cost half though ;(
 
Lori said:
I'm confused why there sublimation would cost half though ;(
Aren't we talking about the bond-dissociation energy of F2?
 
I like Serena said:
Aren't we talking about the bond-dissociation energy of F2?
Oops I meant the bond dissociation . Yeah
 
Lori said:
Oops I meant the bond dissociation . Yeah

Isn't bond dissociation for F2, leaving us with 2 F atoms?
We can make 2 LiF with that.
So the cost for 1 LiF is half of that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lori
I like Serena said:
Isn't bond dissociation for F2, leaving us with 2 F atoms?
We can make 2 LiF with that.
So the cost for 1 LiF is half of that.
Oh it makes sense now. It's cause we only needed 1 so I took one half of the F so I should also take one half of the cost
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I like Serena

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
4K