How Is the Initial Height h0 Calculated in a Spring Compression Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FallingMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial height \( h_0 \) in a spring compression problem involving a block released from rest above a vertical spring. The block compresses the spring upon contact, and participants explore the energy transformations involved in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy at different points in the block's motion. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of energy equations, particularly the use of elastic potential energy and the conditions under which kinetic energy is considered.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the energy conservation principles at play, with some participants clarifying the distinction between kinetic energy and elastic potential energy. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the energy states of the block as it interacts with the spring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about energy states at the moment of contact and the definitions of potential and kinetic energy in the context of the problem. There is a recognition of the need to clarify these concepts to resolve confusion.

FallingMan
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 700 g block is released from rest at height h0 above a ver- tical spring with spring constant k = 400 N/m and negligible mass. The block sticks to the spring and momentarily stops after com- pressing the spring 19.0 cm. What is the value of h0?

Homework Equations



W = 1/2kx^2 where W is the work, k is the spring constant, and x is the distance spring is compressed.

Potential Energy = mgh0 where h0 is the initial height, g is gravitational acceleration, and m is mass.

U0 + KE0 = Uf + KEf , expressing that the kinetic and potential energy before must equal the kinetic and potential energy after.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have the solution for this problem, but I don't really understand it.

At height h0 before release, the block has potential energy and no kinetic energy:
U0 = mgh0

At the contact point between block and spring, the block has some kinetic energy and some potential energy, which will be equal to mgh0.

mgh0 = KE + U

U = mgx, where x is the remaining distance to compress the spring
KE = 1/2mv^2, where v is the velocity of the block upon contact.

I know KE is normally expressed as 1/2mv^2, but the solution shows it as 1/2kx^2.

They make mgh0 = 1/2kx^2 - mgx

This then allows them to calculate the h0. However, I'm confused at how they arrived at that equation (specific questions below):

Why is mgx negative? Why is 1/2kx^2 expressed as the Kinetic energy? I thought 1/2kx^2 is the work done by a spring, not the kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1/2kx^2 is not kinetic energy but it is Elastic Potential Energy. Also it has no kinetic energy when upon contact, as you know kinetic energy = 1/2mv^s and when the block contacts the spring and presses it down the velocity = 0 making kinetic energy = 0, so you know that Ei = Ef, i = initial, f = final, and Ei = Ki + Ui, and Ef = Kf + Uf.
 
Last edited:
Panphobia said:
Also it has no kinetic energy when upon contact
No, it will still have KE on contact. KE only becomes 0 when the spring is fully compressed.
FallingMan said:
They make mgh0 = 1/2kx^2 - mgx
When the spring is fully compressed, the block has descended h0 + x and is again stationary. So ##\frac 12 k x^2 = mg(h_0+x)##
 
FallingMan said:
The block sticks to the spring and momentarily stops after com- pressing the spring 19.0 cm
That is what I meant by it contacts, I am sorry if I was misunderstood.
 
Panphobia and Haruspex,

Thank you for your clear explanation. I was looking at the block as it was contacting the spring, which was overcomplicating my problem. It seems it is much simpler to look at the problem when the kinetic energy is zero in both scenarios, namely at the very top and at the very bottom.

I guess I was also confusing 1/2kx^2 for the kinetic energy when it is the elastic potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K