How is the residue computed for a simple pole in the book on prime numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter camilus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the computation of the residue for a simple pole in the context of the function \(\psi(z)\) as described in a book on prime numbers. The user identifies a discrepancy in the residue calculation, specifically an extra factor of \(1/2\) that appears in their computation but is absent in the book. The residue at the simple pole \(s=1\) is correctly computed as \(Res(f,1) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{z}}\) based on the function \(f(s) = \frac{\xi(s)}{s(s-1)}z^{-\frac{1}{2}s}\), where \(\xi(1) = \frac{1}{2}\). The book states the residue as \(1/\sqrt{z}\), leading to confusion regarding the additional factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly residue theory.
  • Familiarity with the Riemann xi function \(\xi(s)\).
  • Knowledge of contour integration techniques.
  • Basic concepts of analytic functions and poles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann xi function and its significance in number theory.
  • Learn about residue calculations in complex analysis, focusing on simple poles.
  • Explore contour integration methods and their applications in residue computation.
  • Review examples of residue calculations from advanced calculus or complex analysis textbooks.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced number theory, particularly those studying the properties of the Riemann xi function and residue computations.

camilus
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
my book on prime numbers has a line where it skims over a residue computation, and I am in dire need of clarification. It's rather simple, and I may very well be the one mistaken, but I am getting a extra factor of 1/2 in the residue whereas in the book it does not appear and apparently isn't a typo either.

We have [tex]\psi (z) = \sum_{n \in \textbf{N}} e^{-n^2\pi z} = {1 \over 2\pi i}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} {\xi (s) \over s(s-1)}z^{{-1 \over 2}s}ds[/tex] for c>1 and R(z)>0.

next, we move the line of integration left to R(s)=1/2 passing the simple pole at s=1 with residue 1/sqrt(z):

[tex]\psi (z) = {1 \over 2\pi i}\int_{1/2-i\infty}^{1/2+i\infty} {\xi (s) \over s(s-1)}z^{{-1 \over 2}s}ds + {1 \over \sqrt{z}}[/tex]

and for some reason I am getting that the last term should be [tex]{1 \over 2\sqrt{z}}[/tex]The extra 1/2 is coming from the fact that [tex]\xi (1) = 1/2[/tex] when computing the residue of Res(f,1) when [tex]f(s) = {\xi (s) \over s(s-1)}z^{{-1 \over 2}s}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book just states that passing the simple pole leaves a residue of 1/sqrt(z), just as posted above. Can someone see if I am doing this correctly..?

Basically I am computing the residue for [tex]f(s) = {\xi (s) \over s(s-1)}z^{{-1 \over 2}s}[/tex] at s=1 as such:

[tex]Res(f,1) = \lim_{s \rightarrow 1} (s-1)*{\xi (s) \over s(s-1)}z^{{-1 \over 2}s} = {\xi (1) \over 1}z^{{-1 \over 2}}={1 \over 2\sqrt{z}[/tex]

the following link computes the same residue without the z^-s/2 factor. since there is no problems for letting s->1 in that factor so just multiply the link by z^-1/2...

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=residue+of+(xi+function)/(z(z-1))+at+z=1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K