How is this array of capacitors connected: Serie or parallel?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the configuration of three capacitors, C1, C2, and C3, and whether they are connected in series or parallel. Participants argue that one capacitor is in parallel with a series combination of the other two, but the ambiguity of the circuit's layout complicates the analysis. It is noted that the interpretation of connections can vary based on the chosen nodes, leading to multiple valid configurations. The final charge distribution among the capacitors depends on whether they were charged separately or together, highlighting the importance of the charging method in determining their behavior. The conversation emphasizes that without clear node definitions, the series or parallel classification remains ambiguous.
sergioro
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows three capacitors with capacitances C1, C2, and C3. How are they connected: in parallel or in series?


|------| |------|
|.....| (middle dots don't mean any thing. they help keep lines in place)
|---| |---| |---|

Homework Equations



Serie connection: 1/c = 1/c1+ 1/c2+1/c3 ...
parallel: c= c1+ c2+c3 ...

The Attempt at a Solution



I would say that anyone of the capacitors is in parallel with the other two who are in serie. I can get this by making a rotation (either counterclockwise or clockwise) of the capacitors one by one so I can always get the same configuration shown in the figure
(one on top and two in the bottom).

How can I prove it using equations.

Sergio
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Code:
|------| |------|
|               |    
|---| |---| |---|

If this is indeed the situation, then it's obvious just by inspection that one of the caps is in parallel with the series combo of the other two. I'm not sure what you mean by "prove it using equations." If you want to figure out how the caps are connected to each other, you do that by looking at them.
 
Thanks cepheid.

That's the array of caps (how did you make the white spaces in between the vertical lines?).

What is causing trouble is the following:
Call c1 and c2 the caps on bottom and c3 the one on top.

Let's say c2 is charged elsewhere and then inserted in the circuit in
its position at the bottom.

Following the figure, c1 will get the same charge as c2 (they are in serie) and c3 will get something else. This means that if one take the circuit appart each cap will have the computed amount of charge.

Now, If one view the same circuit in a different way, say that is c1 who is in parallel with c2 and c3, then c3 will have the same charge of c2 and c1 will get something else. This means that if one take the circuit apart the distribution of charges is interchanged between c1 and c3.

This does not look right to me. It seems as if the physical process depends on the labeling.

Sergio
 
Consider these circuits which are identical to yours. The question "which capacitors are in series/parallel" can't be answered because the circuit is ambiguous (edit: Perhaps ambiguous is the wrong word). If you add the words "between these two nodes" then it can be answered.

Depending on which two nodes you choose the following are correct answers:

(C1+C2)//C3
(C2+C3)//C1
(C3+C1)//C2

where I'm using
+ = Series
// = parallel

To an engineer your version of the circuit implies you are talking about the two vertical nodes (one on the left and right).

If the capacitors are all the same value then all three answers give same result.
 

Attachments

  • Caps.jpg
    Caps.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 415
Last edited:
sergio_123 said:
Let's say c2 is charged elsewhere and then inserted in the circuit in
its position at the bottom.

Following the figure, c1 will get the same charge as c2 (they are in serie) and c3 will get something else.
You changed your ID?

Capacitors in series get the same charge only if they are in series while being charged. If they are charged separately and then connected in series, their final charges are unlikely going to be equal. (Though what you can say is that any charge C1 loses will be matched by C2 losing the same, if they are in series while being discharged.)
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
588
Replies
2
Views
888
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K