How is Uranium refined so it can be used in nuclear reactors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The uranium refinement process for nuclear reactors involves several key steps, starting with the mining of uranium ore, which is then purified to produce yellow cake (U3O8). This yellow cake is converted to uranyl fluoride (UF6), which is gaseous at elevated temperatures, allowing for the enrichment of U-235. Light Water Reactors (LWRs) typically require uranium with a U-235 content of 3% or higher, while CANDU reactors can utilize natural uranium due to their use of heavy water (D2O). The final product is often processed into uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets, which are encased in zirconium alloy cladding for use in fuel assemblies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uranium isotopes, particularly U-235 and U-238
  • Knowledge of nuclear reactor types, specifically Light Water Reactors (LWRs) and CANDU reactors
  • Familiarity with the uranium fuel cycle, including conversion and enrichment processes
  • Basic concepts of nuclear fuel fabrication and cladding materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the uranium enrichment process, focusing on gas diffusion and gas centrifugation techniques
  • Explore the differences between Light Water Reactors (LWRs) and CANDU reactors in terms of fuel requirements
  • Study the various forms of uranium used in nuclear fuel, such as UO2, UCO, and (U,Pu)O2
  • Investigate the properties and evolution of cladding materials used in nuclear fuel assemblies
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor designers, and anyone involved in the nuclear fuel cycle will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in uranium refinement and reactor fuel specifications.

mathisrad
Messages
20
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
How does Uranium get refined?
I just looked a little bit into how Nuclear power plants work out of curiosity, and I saw that the Uranium they use is U-235, but when I was looking at a website, it said that the Uranium required 3% or higher content of U-235. I wasn't sure if this was correct so I dug a bit deeper at the Uranium refinement process, and was confused about how it worked. I would appreciate it if someone could explain the Uranium refinement process to me (preferably in steps if it's not too much trouble)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes that helps a lot, the previous website I was looking at wasn't the easiest to understand. Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
This was great, thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
mathisrad said:
TL;DR Summary: How does Uranium get refined?

I was looking at a website, it said that the Uranium required 3% or higher content of U-235.
Acutally, the statement applies to LWRs (PWRs or BWRs), which used 'light' water (H2O) for cooling and moderation.

CANDU use heavy water (D2O), which does not absorb thermal neutrons as much as (H2O), therefore one can use natural U (~0.71% 235U). The enrichment is selected based on a number of performance requirement, e.g., residence time (burnup), reactivity requirements, temperature, voiding in the coolant, neutron spectrum, . . . . ). The enrichment must enable the core to achieve criticality during the designed cycle length for a given energy production.

Otherwise, uranium ore is mined and purified (separate the non-uranium portion from the uranium componds, which are processed to 'yellow cake', which is mostly oxides of U.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake

The 'yellow cake' is then processed (converted) to a uranyl fluoride (UF6), which is volatile above 56.2 °C (~133°F), and that gas is processed to increase the fraction of 235U in the gas.

The (UF6) is sent to a fuel fabricator, where the (UF6) is processed to UO2 in conventional LWR and CANDU fuel. Remember, CANDU fuel is not nessarily enriched (but it can be for longer operational cycles), but the processing is much the same from oxides of U, to (UF6) is processed to UO2.

Uranium in nuclear fuel can be in the form of other compounds, e.g., UCO (kernel in TRISO pebble fuel)), UC, UN, UMo (U1-xMox), UZr (U1-xZrx), and USi (U1-xSix). The particular form depends on various performance requirements, such as U density, service and hypothetical accident temperatures, thermal conductivity (throughout design/service life), dimensional stability, chemical compatibility with encapsulating/cladding material, chemical compatibility with the coolant, and fission products retention.

In the case of LWR and CANDU fuel, cylindrical pellets of UO2 are placed in cladding tubes of a Zr-alloy, which have evolved over the last 7 decades. Some earlier LWR fuel was clad in austenitic stainless steels, e.g., AISI types 304, 347 or 348. Stainless steel cladding (usually 316) is standard in liquid metal fast reactor fuel. Fast reactors use greater enrichments of about 20% equivalent, usually in the form of (U,Pu)O2, where U is mostly depleted or natural U, and Pu is some mix of Pu-239, 240, 241, and some 242. Some fast reactor fuel has been UN and UC.

Fuel for gas-cooled, graphite-moderated reactors (e.g., in UK AGRs) have used stainless steel cladding, or graphite encapsulation (Pebble Bed, gas-cooled). In TRISO fuel, the fuel kernel (particle) is encapluated in three layers (PyC, SiC, PyC), where PyC is pyrolytic carbon, and SiC is sliicon carbide.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathisrad and berkeman
Astronuc said:
Acutally, the statement applies to LWRs (PWRs or BWRs), which used 'light' water (H2O) for cooling and moderation.

CANDU use heavy water (D2O), which does not absorb thermal neutrons as much as (H2O), therefore one can use natural U (~0.71% 235U). The enrichment is selected based on a number of performance requirement, e.g., residence time (burnup), reactivity requirements, temperature, voiding in the coolant, neutron spectrum, . . . . ). The enrichment must enable the core to achieve criticality during the designed cycle length for a given energy production.
Carbon also does not absorb thermal neutrons as much as protium, and graphite moderated natural uranium reactors are another common design.
 
snorkack said:
and graphite moderated natural uranium reactors are another common design.
Magnox reactors are not that common; the UK had 26, which are now shutdown. They also use a special cladding, which achieves low burnup, and most units had relatively power ratings.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K