How Long Does a Point on a String Take to Move Between +2.0mm and -2.0mm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sdawg1969
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Wave
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 12K views
Sdawg1969
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If y(x,t)=(6.0mm)sin(kx+(600rad/s)t+[tex]\Phi[/tex]) describes a wave traveling along a string, how much time does any given point on the string take to move between displacements y= +2.0mm and y= -2.0mm?



Homework Equations



I think y(t)=ym sin([tex]\omega[/tex]t) ?



The Attempt at a Solution



well if I plug in 2.0mm for y, 6.00mm for ym and 600rad/s for [tex]\omega[/tex] I come up with the equation 2.0mm=6.00mm sin (600rad/s * t). Where do I go from here? are my assumptions correct so far?

Other things as I am thinking- 600rad/s is about 95.5Hz so each complete cycle from +6mm to -6mm should take .01s or so, so my answer should be less then that.

Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have it- if I then take

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](2/6)=600*T1?

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-2/6)=600*T2?

then [tex]\Delta[/tex]T is T1-T2?

does anyone have any input here?
 
pretty sure I've got it-

y1(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)=kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex]

y2(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

-2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)=kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex]

so...
[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)]=(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])-(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

and...
[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)]=600t1-600t2

finally,

([sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)])/600=t1-t2

do the math and [tex]\Delta[/tex]t is .00113s

I think this is solved
 
no one ever responded to this guys problem, and now I'm actually trying to solve this as well and i tried doing the method he ended up using but i am not getting a correct answer. Although his method for the most part looks right and makes sense to me, the only thing I figure would be the problem is that x isn't a constant so they should cancel i don't think...but I'm not sure what else to do with so many unknown variables...any help?
 
oops nevermind...my calculator was in degree mode instead of radian mode