How Long Does a Point on a String Take to Move Between +2.0mm and -2.0mm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sdawg1969
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Wave
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a wave described by the equation y(x,t)=(6.0mm)sin(kx+(600rad/s)t+Φ) and seeks to determine the time taken for a point on the string to move between the displacements of +2.0mm and -2.0mm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the wave parameters and the time taken for specific displacements. There are attempts to derive equations based on the sine function and to calculate time differences between displacements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have proposed equations to find the time differences and are exploring the implications of their assumptions. There is an acknowledgment of potential issues with variable constants and the need for clarification on the setup. Others express uncertainty about the correctness of the methods used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring the calculator is set to the correct mode (radians vs degrees) and question the treatment of the variable x in the equations.

Sdawg1969
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If y(x,t)=(6.0mm)sin(kx+(600rad/s)t+[tex]\Phi[/tex]) describes a wave traveling along a string, how much time does any given point on the string take to move between displacements y= +2.0mm and y= -2.0mm?



Homework Equations



I think y(t)=ym sin([tex]\omega[/tex]t) ?



The Attempt at a Solution



well if I plug in 2.0mm for y, 6.00mm for ym and 600rad/s for [tex]\omega[/tex] I come up with the equation 2.0mm=6.00mm sin (600rad/s * t). Where do I go from here? are my assumptions correct so far?

Other things as I am thinking- 600rad/s is about 95.5Hz so each complete cycle from +6mm to -6mm should take .01s or so, so my answer should be less then that.

Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
I think I have it- if I then take

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](2/6)=600*T1?

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-2/6)=600*T2?

then [tex]\Delta[/tex]T is T1-T2?

does anyone have any input here?
 
pretty sure I've got it-

y1(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)=kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex]

y2(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

-2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)=kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex]

so...
[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)]=(kx+600t1+[tex]\Phi[/tex])-(kx+600t2+[tex]\Phi[/tex])

and...
[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)]=600t1-600t2

finally,

([sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](1/3)]-[sin[tex]^{}-1[/tex](-1/3)])/600=t1-t2

do the math and [tex]\Delta[/tex]t is .00113s

I think this is solved
 
no one ever responded to this guys problem, and now I'm actually trying to solve this as well and i tried doing the method he ended up using but i am not getting a correct answer. Although his method for the most part looks right and makes sense to me, the only thing I figure would be the problem is that x isn't a constant so they should cancel i don't think...but I'm not sure what else to do with so many unknown variables...any help?
 
oops nevermind...my calculator was in degree mode instead of radian mode
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K