How long until the next global war?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LennoxLewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Global
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for major global conflicts in the coming decades, particularly given the current state of globalization and resource management. Participants express concerns about overpopulation, resource scarcity, and the effectiveness of modern weaponry, suggesting that these factors could lead to inevitable wars. There is a belief that the Western world, which enjoys unprecedented luxury, may face civil unrest if economic conditions deteriorate, echoing historical patterns of discord among diverse ethnic groups.Some argue that while the risk of traditional warfare may be low due to the destructive capabilities of modern militaries, economic conflicts and proxy wars could emerge as significant threats. The conversation also touches on the importance of energy choices and sustainable practices in preventing future conflicts, emphasizing that the transition away from fossil fuels could mitigate risks. Overall, there is a prevailing sentiment that without proactive measures, humanity may not avoid significant conflict in the next fifty years.
  • #31
You raise some good points. My $0.02:

LennoxLewis said:
It's been more than 60 years since the last world war. Society has become more globalized than ever. We (the Western world) are living in more luxury than kings were, a century ago*. (*Might be a slight exaggeration, but you get the point.)

I think it's more than "slight." I enjoy a normal, non-drafty, temperature-controlled two-bedroom apartment, with hot and cold running water, dishwasher, and washer and dryer. So, some of the creature comforts are better than those in a medevil castle.

But are they really, especially for a king? I've been to several castles, and many were dark, damp, and musty. But others were far better, although I don't know if it's because they'd been converted into museums, along with central air (which I suspect). But what about my having to cook, clean, and do laundry for myself? No king does that! Then again, I don't have to deal with tedious affairs of state or dangerous conquests, either.

The Western society is based on the ridiculously low prices of transportation for almost all resources, most importantly food. I think the chain can easily been broken and war is inevitable.

The more we wean ourselves from fossil fuels, the less we're exposed to a colossal breakage of that chain, and the less liklihood of another global war.

This is not to mention how our weapons are more effective and deadly than ever before in history.

I would argue they're more precise, capable of accomplishing the same task with many times less collateral damage. Why bomb entire rail yards when you can simply take out each of the locomotives and facilities used to repair them?

Although it's not exactly a daily issue for me, I very much doubt we're going through the first half of this century without a major conflict. Opinions?

I think we can avoid it, provided we stop monkeying around. Nuclear, wind, and solar - now, before it's too late.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
18K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K