How long until the next global war?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LennoxLewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Global
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inevitability of major global conflicts, particularly World War III, due to increasing population pressures, resource scarcity, and geopolitical tensions, especially between China and the United States. Participants argue that the Western world’s reliance on cheap transportation for resources, including food, makes it vulnerable to disruptions that could trigger war. The Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention is mentioned as a trend, but many believe that historical patterns of discord, particularly racial and economic, will resurface if capitalism fails to meet societal needs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geopolitical dynamics, particularly U.S.-China relations.
  • Knowledge of resource management and sustainability issues.
  • Familiarity with historical patterns of conflict and revolution.
  • Awareness of economic theories, including the Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of resource scarcity on global stability.
  • Examine the Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention in detail.
  • Study historical case studies of revolutions and their causes.
  • Analyze current U.S.-China relations and their potential impact on global peace.
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, historians, economists, and anyone interested in understanding the factors that could lead to future global conflicts.

  • #31
You raise some good points. My $0.02:

LennoxLewis said:
It's been more than 60 years since the last world war. Society has become more globalized than ever. We (the Western world) are living in more luxury than kings were, a century ago*. (*Might be a slight exaggeration, but you get the point.)

I think it's more than "slight." I enjoy a normal, non-drafty, temperature-controlled two-bedroom apartment, with hot and cold running water, dishwasher, and washer and dryer. So, some of the creature comforts are better than those in a medevil castle.

But are they really, especially for a king? I've been to several castles, and many were dark, damp, and musty. But others were far better, although I don't know if it's because they'd been converted into museums, along with central air (which I suspect). But what about my having to cook, clean, and do laundry for myself? No king does that! Then again, I don't have to deal with tedious affairs of state or dangerous conquests, either.

The Western society is based on the ridiculously low prices of transportation for almost all resources, most importantly food. I think the chain can easily been broken and war is inevitable.

The more we wean ourselves from fossil fuels, the less we're exposed to a colossal breakage of that chain, and the less liklihood of another global war.

This is not to mention how our weapons are more effective and deadly than ever before in history.

I would argue they're more precise, capable of accomplishing the same task with many times less collateral damage. Why bomb entire rail yards when you can simply take out each of the locomotives and facilities used to repair them?

Although it's not exactly a daily issue for me, I very much doubt we're going through the first half of this century without a major conflict. Opinions?

I think we can avoid it, provided we stop monkeying around. Nuclear, wind, and solar - now, before it's too late.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
18K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K