How Long Until Two Masses Collide Due to Gravity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time it takes for two point masses to collide due to their mutual gravitational attraction, starting from rest at a distance 'd'. The problem involves concepts from gravitational physics and differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various mathematical approaches to model the gravitational interaction, including differential equations and substitutions. Questions arise regarding the validity of certain steps and the implications of using non-constant forces in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on alternative methods and substitutions, while others express doubts about specific steps taken in the reasoning process. Multiple interpretations of the problem and approaches to the solution are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made regarding the nature of the forces involved and the mathematical treatment of the problem, particularly concerning the use of varying forces and the implications for harmonic motion.

shakgoku
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1.The question
Two point masses m_{1} and m_{2} are initially at rest. Distance between them is 'd'. How much time does it take for them to collide due to mutual gravitational attraction?2. Relavant Equations:
F = \frac{Gm_{1}m_{2}}{r^2} \<br /> <br /> \mu = \frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}Attempt at a solution:
3. force is varying with time. My first guess is to try to solve the differential equation
\mu \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = F(x)
and tried to solve it for x(t)
But , was not successful so far. There should be a better approach..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi shakgoku! :wink:

that should work …

show us how far you got :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi shakgoku! :wink:

that should work …

show us how far you got :smile:

Hello tiny tim! This is how I proceeded,

\mu \frac{d^2x}{dx^2} = - \frac{Gm_{1}m_{2}}{x^2} <br /> \\
.

.<br /> -\mu \frac{x^2}{Gm_{1}m_{2}} = \frac{d^2t}{dx^2} <br /> \\

by guess general solution will be of the form,

t = Cx^4 +C_{1} <br />.

.<br /> \frac{d^2t}{dx^2} = 12Cx^2 = -\mu \frac{x^2}{Gm_{1}m_{2}} <br />.

.<br /> <br /> C = \frac{-\mu}{12Gm_{1}m_{2}}<br /> \\<br />

And at t = 0, x = d,

C_{1} = \frac{\mu d^4}{12Gm_{1}m_{2}} <br /> <br />

..<br /> <br /> t = \frac{\mu (d^4-x^4)}{12Gm_{1}m_{2}}<br />

When the masses collide, d = 0,
using it I got,
t = \frac{d^4}{12G(m_{1}+m_{2})}\\*<br />

I doubt if my 2nd step is wrong.
 
Last edited:
eugh!

you've used d2t/dx2 = 1/(d2x/dt2),

but that's not true

d2t/dx2 = d(dt/dx)/dx = 1/(dx/d(dt/dx)), and that's about as far as you can go :redface:

instead, use d2x/dt2 = dv/dt = dv/dx dx/dt = v dv/dx :smile:
 
Thanks. I had doubts but
I just got carried away because its easy to solve after making that wrong step :D

I finally made the substitution you suggested and got an integral of form

A \int_{0}^{d} \sqrt{\frac{x}{d-x}} dx =t

And I solved it to get

t = \frac{\pi d}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2G(m_{1}+m_{2})d}}

Which is the answer. I throughly liked it because, \pi got involved even though point masses separated by a distance, Newton's gravitational law do not contain \pi
:)
 
π gets everywhere! :biggrin:
 
:biggrin:
I get the same answer by considering,

F = -kx

and using

k = \frac{dF}{dx}

==&gt; k = \frac{2Gm_{1}m_{2}}{x^3}

and

T = {2 \pi} \sqrt { \frac{\mu}{k}}

At

\frac{T}{4}

Collison occurs, so t = \frac{T}{4} = {\frac{\pi d}{2}}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2G(m_{1}+m_{2})d}}} Which is same as the above answer. How does this approach work even though k is not a constant and this is not a simple harmonic motion?
Can I use this approach for any time varying force?
 
Last edited:
i think it's just a coincidence :confused:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K