MHB How Many Books Did Devi Read in a Month?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Tom and Devi read 34 books in a month. Devi and Weiming read 58 books in the same month. Weiming read twice as many books as Tom. How many books did Devi read in that month?

My way of answering it:

x + x + 2x = 92

x = 23

I got stuck there.However
The book answer is 58 - 34. Then 34 -24 = 10. So Devi read 10 books, But I'm not sure how they got that answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
x + x + 2x = 92
This would be correct if Tom and Devi read the same number of books, which is denoted by $x$ in your equation. But there is no reason to think so.

Let $t$, $d$ amd $w$ be the number of books read by Tom, Devi and Weiming, respectively. Then we can get the following equations from the problem statement.
\[
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
t+d&=34\\
d+w&=58\\
w&=2t
\end{aligned}
\right.
\]
Substituting $w$ from the third equation into the second one, we get
\[
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
t+d&=34\\
2t+d&=58\\
\end{aligned}
\right.
\]
The difference between the left-hand sides, i.e., $(2t+d)-(t+d)=t$, and from the right-hand sides the same difference is $58-34=24$. Therefore, $t=34$. Then from the first equation we get $d=34-t=34-24=10$.
 
Though it's good to work it out as Evgeny did there is a shortcut:

T + D = 34

2T + 2D = 68
2T + D = 58
---------------------
0 + D = 10
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top