How many different research teams can the director build?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Build Research
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a combinatorial problem involving the formation of research teams from a group of mathematicians and physicists, specifically addressing the constraints imposed by two physicists who refuse to cooperate. Participants explore various methods to calculate the number of valid team combinations under these restrictions.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using the formula $\binom{6}{3} \cdot \binom{7-2}{4}$ to calculate the number of teams, assuming the exclusion of both non-cooperative physicists.
  • Others argue that it may be acceptable to include one of the non-cooperative physicists, leading to further calculations.
  • A participant explains that $\binom{6}{3}$ represents the selection of mathematicians, while $\binom{5}{2}$ accounts for the selection of physicists excluding the two who do not cooperate.
  • Another participant suggests calculating the total number of teams and subtracting the invalid combinations that include both non-cooperative physicists.
  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of including or excluding specific physicists in their calculations.
  • One participant outlines the different scenarios for including physicists A and B, leading to a more complex calculation involving multiple cases.
  • Another participant clarifies that $\binom{5}{2}$ refers to any two physicists not including the two specific non-cooperative ones.
  • Participants discuss the total number of physicist teams and how to arrive at the final count of valid combinations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the problem, with multiple competing views on how to handle the restrictions posed by the non-cooperative physicists and the resulting calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions made regarding the interpretation of the problem's wording, particularly about the cooperation of specific physicists and the implications for team formation. The discussion reflects various interpretations and calculations that may lead to different conclusions.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! :rolleyes:

I am given the following exercise:

The director of a research institute has in possession $6$ mathematicians and $7$ physicists.A research program requires the participation of $3$ mathematicians and $4$ physicists.How many different research teams can the director build,given that $2$ specific physicists deny to cooperate?

I thought that it could be like that: $\binom{6}{3} \cdot \binom{7-2}{4}$
Is it right or am I wrong? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
The director of a research institute has in possession $6$ mathematicians and $7$ physicists.A research program requires the participation of $3$ mathematicians and $4$ physicists.How many different research teams can the director build,given that $2$ specific physicists deny to cooperate?
I thought that it could be like that: $\binom{6}{3} \cdot \binom{7-2}{4}$
Is it right or am I wrong? :confused:

With no restrictions at all there are $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{7}{4}$ ways to form the group.

Now that are $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ ways to form the group with the two non-cooperative physicists together on it. But that is exactly what we must avoid.

How do we use those two to answer the question?
 
evinda said:
Hello! :rolleyes:

I am given the following exercise:

The director of a research institute has in possession $6$ mathematicians and $7$ physicists.A research program requires the participation of $3$ mathematicians and $4$ physicists.How many different research teams can the director build,given that $2$ specific physicists deny to cooperate?

I thought that it could be like that: $\binom{6}{3} \cdot \binom{7-2}{4}$
Is it right or am I wrong? :confused:

Hey! :)

It seems you don't want either of those 2 physicists on your team! (Wait)
But I think it would be okay if you just have 1 of those physicists in the team...
 
I like Serena said:
Hey! :)

It seems you don't want either of those 2 physicists on your team! (Wait)
But I think it would be okay if you just have 1 of those physicists in the team...

Oh yes,right! (Nod) But how can I calculate then the number of physicists that could be in a team?? :confused:

- - - Updated - - -

Plato said:
Now that are $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ ways to form the group with the two non-cooperative physicists together on it. But that is exactly what we must avoid.
Could you explain me further what this $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ stands for? (Wondering)
 
evinda said:
Oh yes,right! (Nod) But how can I calculate then the number of physicists that could be in a team?? :confused:

Let's start with the number of physicist teams that won't work out if those 2 physicists, that are so difficult, would be in it.
Can you calculate that?
 
evinda said:
Oh yes,right! (Nod) But how can I calculate then the number of physicists that could be in a team?? :confused:

- - - Updated - - -

Could you explain me further what this $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ stands for?

$\dbinom{6}{3}$ is the number of ways to choose the mathematicians.

$\dbinom{5}{2}$ is the number of ways to choose the two of the of the five cooperating physicists to put with the two who will not cooperate.

In other words $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ is the number of team we do not want.

Subtract that from the total number of possible teams.
 
I like Serena said:
Let's start with the number of physicist teams that won't work out if those 2 physicists, that are so difficult, would be in it.
Can you calculate that?

As two physicists don't want to cooperate, we don't want $\binom{5}{2}$ physicists,or don't we take into consideration then that two specific don't want to cooperate?? :confused:

- - - Updated - - -

Plato said:
$\dbinom{6}{3}$ is the number of ways to choose the mathematicians.

$\dbinom{5}{2}$ is the number of ways to choose the two of the of the five cooperating physicists to put with the two who will not cooperate.

In other words $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$ is the number of team we do not want.

Subtract that from the total number of possible teams.

So, $\dbinom{5}{2}$ expresses the two specific physicists,that don't want to cooperate,or just any two ones?
 
evinda said:
As two physicists don't want to cooperate, we don't want $\binom{5}{2}$ physicists,or don't we take into consideration then that two specific don't want to cooperate?? :confused:

Let's take into consideration that 2 specific ones, say Anna and Berta, do not want to cooperate.
 
I like Serena said:
Let's take into consideration that 2 specific ones, say Anna and Berta, do not want to cooperate.

I don't really know...So, $\binom{7}{4}-\binom{4}{2}$ physicists are possible to me in a team?? :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
evinda said:
I don't really know...So, $\binom{7}{4}-\binom{4}{2}$ physicists are possible to me in a team?? :confused:

O.K. Admittedly we are making several assumptions about the setup (the wording) of your question.
Both of us assume that there are two physicists who will not serve together, call them A & B.
That means that any research group cannot have both A & B among the seven.
Now a group can have A but not B, B but not A, or not A and not B.

The number of ways that a research group can contain A and not B is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{3}.$

The number of ways that a research group can contain B and not A is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{3}.$

The number of ways that a research group can contain not A and not B is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{4}.$

If you add those three numbers together you will see it is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{7}{4}-\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
evinda said:
So, $\dbinom{5}{2}$ expresses the two specific physicists,that don't want to cooperate,or just any two ones?

The number $\dbinom{7-2}{2} = \dbinom{5}{2}$ expresses any 2 physicists that are not the 2 specific physicists.
That is, we pick 2 physicists from the remaining 5 and we pair them up with A and B, so we have a team of 4 physicists.
 
  • #12
I like Serena said:
The number $\dbinom{7-2}{2} = \dbinom{5}{2}$ expresses any 2 physicists that are not the 2 specific physicists.
That is, we pick 2 physicists from the remaining 5 and we pair them up with A and B, so we have a team of 4 physicists.

I like Serena said:
The number $\dbinom{7-2}{2} = \dbinom{5}{2}$ expresses any 2 physicists that are not the 2 specific physicists.
That is, we pick 2 physicists from the remaining 5 and we pair them up with A and B, so we have a team of 4 physicists.

If we consider that the physicists are these:

$P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,P7$

and $P6,P7$ don't want to cooperate, aren't the couples, except from $P6 \text{ with} P7$ these?
  • P1-P2
  • P1-P3
  • P1-P4
  • P1-P5
  • P1-P6
  • P1-P7
  • P2-P3
  • P2-P3
  • P2-P4
  • P2-P5
  • P2-P6
  • P2-P7
  • P3-P4
  • P3-P5
  • P3-P6
  • P3-P7
  • P4-P5
  • P4-P6
  • P4-P7
  • P5-P6
  • P5-P7

So,there are $20$ possible couples...But, $ \dbinom{5}{2}=\frac{5!}{2!3!}=10$..Doesn't $ \dbinom{5}{2}$ stand for the possible couples,except from the two,that do not want to cooperate? Or have I understood it wrong?? :confused: (Blush)
 
  • #13
We intended the number of teams that won't work out:
  1. P1-P2-P6-P7
  2. P1-P3-P6-P7
  3. P1-P4-P6-P7
  4. P1-P5-P6-P7
  5. P2-P3-P6-P7
  6. P2-P4-P6-P7
  7. P2-P5-P6-P7
  8. P3-P4-P6-P7
  9. P3-P5-P6-P7
  10. P4-P5-P6-P7

As you can see these are $\dbinom{5}{2}=10$ possibilities that always include $P6-P7$. (Bandit)

Since the total number of physicist teams is $\dbinom{7}{4}$, the number of allowed teams is:
$$\dbinom{7}{4} - \dbinom{5}{2} = 35 - 10 = 25$$
(Sun)
 
  • #14
I like Serena said:
We intended the number of teams that won't work out:
  1. P1-P2-P6-P7
  2. P1-P3-P6-P7
  3. P1-P4-P6-P7
  4. P1-P5-P6-P7
  5. P2-P3-P6-P7
  6. P2-P4-P6-P7
  7. P2-P5-P6-P7
  8. P3-P4-P6-P7
  9. P3-P5-P6-P7
  10. P4-P5-P6-P7

As you can see these are $\dbinom{5}{2}=10$ possibilities that always include $P6-P7$. (Bandit)

Since the total number of physicist teams is $\dbinom{7}{4}$, the number of allowed teams is:
$$\dbinom{7}{4} - \dbinom{5}{2} = 35 - 10 = 25$$
(Sun)

I think I understood it! So,the director can build $25 \cdot 20=500$ research teams,right? :confused:
 
  • #15
evinda said:
I think I understood it! So,the director can build $25 \cdot 20=500$ research teams,right? :confused:

Yep! (Mmm)
 
  • #16
Plato said:
O.K. Admittedly we are making several assumptions about the setup (the wording) of your question.
Both of us assume that there are two physicists who will not serve together, call them A & B.
That means that any research group cannot have both A & B among the seven.
Now a group can have A but not B, B but not A, or not A and not B.

The number of ways that a research group can contain A and not B is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{3}.$

The number of ways that a research group can contain B and not A is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{3}.$

The number of ways that a research group can contain not A and not B is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{4}.$

If you add those three numbers together you will see it is $\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{7}{4}-\dbinom{6}{3}\dbinom{5}{2}$

I like Serena said:
Yep! (Mmm)
Nice,thank you! :rolleyes:
 
  • #17
I like to think of the 2 physicists as a separate group. The options are taking neither of these 2, or taking one. So the number of possible teams is $6C3.5C4+6C3.5C3.2C1$, the first term corresponding to taking neither of the two refusers, the second term corresponding to taking (exactly) 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K