How many electron charges are there on the drop? (Millikan)

In summary: Weight = Upthrust + Electric forceWeight, as you say, shouldn't be 4/3 π r3 ρo g but F = m g.Upthrust is zero.Electric force = Q E, Q = charge on the drop, E = the electric field strength.There will be a different drag force acting when the drop is moving upwards because its moving at a different speed than when it was falling. You need to account for that drag force. Use the given assumption about the drag force.In summary, we have a problem where we need to find the number of electron charges on a drop of oil in Millikan's method for measuring the electron charge. With a potential difference of 1.
  • #1
moenste
711
12

Homework Statement


In a measurement of the electron charge by Millikan's method, a potential difference of 1.5 kV can be applied between horizontal parallel metal plates 12 mm apart. With the field switched off, a drop of oil of mass 10-14 kg is observed to fall with constant velocity 400 μm s-1. When the field is switched on, the drop rises with constant velocity 80 μm s-1. How many electron charges are there on the drop? (You may assume that the air resistance is proportional to the velocity of the drop, and that air buoyancy may be neglected.)

(The electronic charge = 1.6 * 10-19 C, the acceleration due to gravity = 10 m s-2.)

Answer: 6.

2. The attempt at a solution
As I understand I need to find Q?

In my book I have this formula: Q = 6 π r η v / E, where η is the coefficient of viscosity of air. The formula is applicable "when an electric field has been applied such that the drop is stationary." There are also formulas when there is no electric field, but I think in this case we have electric field.

But we don't have the radius and have the distance between plates instead.

I am also not sure whether I need to find Q, or some other value. Also how to find η?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
moenste said:
As I understand I need to find Q?

In my book I have this formula: Q = 6 π r η v / E, where η is the coefficient of viscosity of air. The formula is applicable "when an electric field has been applied such that the drop is stationary." There are also formulas when there is no electric field, but I think in this case we have electric field.

But we don't have the radius and have the distance between plates instead.

I am also not sure whether I need to find Q, or some other value. Also how to find η?

Yes you need to find Q. In particular you need to find out how many elementary charges it takes to total up to Q.

You are not given enough information to calculate the drag force directly. However, you are told to assume that it is proportional to velocity. Can you determine one value for the drag force at a particular velocity (other than zero velocity, of course)? Can you then scale it for other velocities?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #3
gneill said:
Yes you need to find Q. In particular you need to find out how many elementary charges it takes to total up to Q.

You are not given enough information to calculate the drag force directly. However, you are told to assume that it is proportional to velocity. Can you determine one value for the drag force at a particular velocity (other than zero velocity, of course)? Can you then scale it for other velocities?
Q = (6 π η / E) * (9 η v / 2 ρo g)1 / 2 v

E = V / d = 1500 / 0.012 = 125 000 V m-1.

Now η (coefficient of viscosity of air) and ρo (density of oil) are required.

Update
As I understand when there is no electric field velocity is 400 μm s-1. Weight = Upthrust due to air + Viscous drag. Upthrust is zero. So: (4/3) π r3 po g = 6 π r η v. Simplify them to find radius: r = √ 4.5 η v / ρo g.

Then we find radius and turn the field on. We already found E = 125 000 V m-1. And then we use Q = (4/3) π r3 ρo g / E. Q = 4 π (√ 4.5 η v / ρo g)3 ρo g / 3 E.

Only need to find η and ρo somehow...
 
Last edited:
  • #4
You can forget the formula for drag and all of its constants that you don't know. Just find the force (in Newtons) that it creates when the oil drop is falling at a constant speed without the electric field in place.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #5
gneill said:
You can forget the formula for drag and all of its constants that you don't know. Just find the force (in Newtons) that it creates when the oil drop is falling at a constant speed without the electric field in place.
Hm, is it F = m g? We have the mass present.
 
  • #6
moenste said:
Hm, is it F = m g? We have the mass present.
Yes. The drop is falling with constant velocity so the net force acting is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #7
gneill said:
Yes. The drop is falling with constant velocity so the net force acting is zero.
F = m g
E = V / d

m g = Q (V / d)
Q = m g d / V = 10-14 * 10 * 0.012 / 1500 = 8 * 10-19 C.
 
  • #8
moenste said:
F = m g
E = V / d
You want to specify that that force F above is the force due to drag for that one velocity only.
m g = Q (V / d)
Q = m g d / V = 10-14 * 10 * 0.012 / 1500 = 8 * 10-19 C.
Can you explain in words what the first equation above represents? I can see an electric force, I can see the gravitational force, but I don't see the drag accounted for.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #9
gneill said:
You want to specify that that force F above is the force due to drag for that one velocity only.

Can you explain in words what the first equation above represents? I can see an electric force, I can see the gravitational force, but I don't see the drag accounted for.
Weigth = Upthrust + Electric force
Weight, as you say, shouldn't be 4/3 π r3 ρo g but F = m g.

Upthrust is zero.

Electric force = Q E, Q = charge on the drop, E = the electric field strength.
 
  • #10
There will be a different drag force acting when the drop is moving upwards because its moving at a different speed than when it was falling. You need to account for that drag force. Use the given assumption about the drag force and velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #11
gneill said:
There will be a different drag force acting when the drop is moving upwards because its moving at a different speed than when it was falling. You need to account for that drag force. Use the given assumption about the drag force and velocity.
What is drag force?
 
  • #12
moenste said:
What is drag force?
Air resistance, or viscous drag. You calculated a value for the drag force for the falling oil drop in posts #5 and #7.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #13
gneill said:
Air resistance, or viscous drag. You calculated a value for the drag force for the falling oil drop in posts #5 and #7.
I'm sorry, I don't get it.

I need to find Q. Assuming everything I did is not correct. What do I need to do then?

Update
I think I understand what you mean. If we have no electric field then the drop is falling and therefore weight = m g. And therefore we have weight = upthrust due to air + viscous drag (in contrast to when there is an electric field and weight = upthrust + electric force). I used to formula for the situation when an electric field is present.

So now we have weight = viscous drag. m g = 6 π r η v. Though I don't see how it helps -- we need the radius and the coefficient of viscosity of air η.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Yes, you need to find Q. You do that by finding out what force that charge experiences due to the known electric field. But there are several forces acting at once and you need to factor out their contributions. Gravity is easy because you have the mass of the oil drop. Air resistance also acts on the drop whenever it is moving through air. It's a type of friction.

The idea is to establish what this friction force is for the upward moving drop so that you can "remove it" from the sum of forces, just as you will "remove" the gravitational force.

That's why you went to the trouble of finding what the air resistance force is for the drop while it was falling at constant speed. The only two forces acting then were gravity and this friction force.

Now you need to find the friction force acting on the upward moving drop so that you can account for it in the net force sum.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #15
gneill said:
Yes, you need to find Q. You do that by finding out what force that charge experiences due to the known electric field. But there are several forces acting at once and you need to factor out their contributions. Gravity is easy because you have the mass of the oil drop. Air resistance also acts on the drop whenever it is moving through air. It's a type of friction.

The idea is to establish what this friction force is for the upward moving drop so that you can "remove it" from the sum of forces, just as you will "remove" the gravitational force.

That's why you went to the trouble of finding what the air resistance force is for the drop while it was falling at constant speed. The only two forces acting then were gravity and this friction force.

Now you need to find the friction force acting on the upward moving drop so that you can account for it in the net force sum.
Not sure whether you saw this:
moenste said:
Update
I think I understand what you mean. If we have no electric field then the drop is falling and therefore weight = m g. And therefore we have weight = upthrust due to air + viscous drag (in contrast to when there is an electric field and weight = upthrust + electric force). I used to formula for the situation when an electric field is present.

So now we have weight = viscous drag. m g = 6 π r η v. Though I don't see how it helps -- we need the radius and the coefficient of viscosity of air η.
Is this correct logic?
 
  • #16
moenste said:
Is this correct logic?
Yes the logic is fine as far as it goes. But you don't need to know any of the constants for the air resistance formula; it's not needed here since you can use the value for the force at a particular velocity to find the force for other velocities thanks to the given assumption about how the air resistance varies with velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #17
gneill said:
Yes the logic is fine as far as it goes. But you don't need to know any of the constants for the air resistance formula; it's not needed here since you can use the value for the force at a particular velocity to find the force for other velocities thanks to the given assumption about how the air resistance varies with velocity.
OK, so no electric field: Weight = Upthrust (zero) + Air resistance → m g = Air resistance.

With electric field: Weight = Upthrust (zero) + Electric force → 4 / 3 π r3 ρo g = Q E → 4 / 3 π r3 ρo g = Q V / d.

I think this should be correct.
 
  • #18
You're still plugging in the useless air resistance formula. You need to use the first air resistance force to find a value for the second. Then write your force balance using that.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #19
gneill said:
You're still plugging in the useless air resistance formula. You need to use the first air resistance force to find a value for the second. Then write your force balance using that.
In that case I'm missing some force.

This is what I have my book:
dbbde07626c3.jpg


From book:
No EF: Weight = Upthrust due to air + Viscous drag.
EF: Weight = Upthrust + Electric force.

So:
No EF: Viscous drag = 10-14 * 10 = 10-13 N.
EF: Q = m g / (V / d) = 10-13 / (1500 / 0.012) = 8 * 10-19 C.

So we have the answer Q = 8 * 10-19 C. I don't understand why we need all the other numbers given in the problem and why we need to calculate the no EF force.
 
  • #20
In the book's figure the drop on the right hand side is stationary, so no air resistance force, just the electric force balancing the gravitational force.

In the present problem the oil drop is moving in both cases.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #21
gneill said:
In the book's figure the drop on the right hand side is stationary, so no air resistance force, just the electric force balancing the gravitational force.

In the present problem the oil drop is moving in both cases.
Aaaah, it even says so.

So, in that case:
No EF: Air resistance = 10-14 * 10 = 10-13 N.
EF: Weight = Upthrust + Electric force + Air resistance → 10-13 N = zero + Q E + 10-13 N → Q E = 0?
 
  • #22
I don't see where you've determined the air resistance force for the new oil drop speed. The speed is different than the first case so the air resistance must be different. Use the first case result to find the value for the new speed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #23
gneill said:
I don't see where you've determined the air resistance force for the new oil drop speed. The speed is difference than the first case so the air resistance must be different. Use the first case result to find the value for the new speed.
Maybe something like Air resistanceFalling * SpeedFalling = ARRising * SpeedRising → 10-13 * (400 * 10-6) = ARRising * (80 * 10-6) → ARRising = 5 * 10-13 N?

Weight = Upthrust + EF + ARRising
10-13 N = zero + Q E + 5 * 10-13 N
Q E = -4 * 10-13 N
Q = -4 * 10-13 / 125 000 = -3.2 * 10-18 Q.
 
  • #24
Let's concentrate on the air resistance for a moment.

In the first case you have:
v1 = 400 (micrometers per second)
F1 = Mg = 10-13 N

Now you are given that air resistance is proportional to velocity. Mathematically: F ∝ v

Write that as an equality by inserting a proportionality constant and solve for that constant. Then you can determine the F for any given v.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #25
gneill said:
Let's concentrate on the air resistance for a moment.

In the first case you have:
v1 = 400 (micrometers per second)
F1 = Mg = 10-13 N

Now you are given that air resistance is proportional to velocity. Mathematically: F ∝ v

Write that as an equality by inserting a proportionality constant and solve for that constant. Then you can determine the F for any given v.
v1 = 4 * 10-4 m s-1.
F1 = m g = 10-14 * 10 = 10-13 N.

v2 = 8 * 10-5 m s-1.
F2 = ?

F1 = k v1, where k = F1 / v1 = 10-13 / 4 * 10-4 = 2.5 * 10-10.

So F2 = k v2 = 2.5 * 10-10 * 8 * 10-5 = 2 * 10-14 N.

---

Weight = Upthrust + EF + ARRising or F2
10-13 N = zero + Q E + 2 * 10-14 N
Q E = 8 * 10-14 N
Q = 8 * 10-14 / 125 000 = 6.4 * 10-19 Q.

Then 6.4 * 10-19 / 1.6 * 10-19 = 4, not 6 as in the answer. What's wrong? I recalculated everything and checked the book answer, it's 6. So, don't think that it's the calculation.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
moenste said:
v1 = 4 * 10-4 m s-1.
F1 = m g = 10-14 * 10 = 10-13 N.

v2 = 8 * 10-5 m s-1.
F2 = ?

F1 = k v1, where k = F1 / v1 = 10-13 / 4 * 10-4 = 2.5 * 10-10.

So F2 = k v2 = 2.5 * 10-10 * 8 * 10-5 = 2 * 10-14 N.
Okay, good so far!
Weight = Upthrust + EF + ARRising or F2
10-13 N = zero + Q E + 2 * 10-14 N
Q E = 8 * 10-14 N
Q = 8 * 10-14 / 125 000 = 6.4 * 10-19 Q.

Then 6.4 * 10-19 / 1.6 * 10-19 = 4, not 6 as in the answer. What's wrong? I recalculated everything and checked the book answer, it's 6. So, don't think that it's the calculation.
Friction always works against the direction of motion. You've added the friction force to the "Upthrust" and electric force, which is not correct. You might find it helpful to write out the force balance so that it sums to zero. Since this mysterious "Upthrust" is always zero, just drop it from your equation:

##F_E - Weight - F_2 = 0##

Where ##F_E## is the electric force.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #27
gneill said:
Okay, good so far!

Friction always works against the direction of motion. You've added the friction force to the "Upthrust" and electric force, which is not correct. You might find it helpful to write out the force balance so that it sums to zero. Since this mysterious "Upthrust" is always zero, just drop it from your equation:

##F_E - Weight - F_2 = 0##

Where ##F_E## is the electric force.
Yes, I think I lost that moment. Air resistance is against motion. Since the drop is moving upwards, therefore the air resistance is directed downwards in pair with the weight.

So it's Q E = Weight + Air resistance.
Q E = 2 * 10-14 N + 10-13 N.
Q E = 1.2 * 10-13 N
Q = 1.2 * 10-13 / 125 000 = 9.6 * 10-19 Q.

Then 9.6 * 10-19 / 1.6 * 10-19 = 6.

Thank you! : )
 

What is the Millikan oil drop experiment?

The Millikan oil drop experiment is a scientific experiment conducted by Robert A. Millikan in 1909 to determine the elementary electric charge (the charge of a single electron).

How many electron charges are there on the drop?

The Millikan oil drop experiment determined the charge of a single electron to be approximately 1.6 x 10^-19 Coulombs.

How was the charge of the electron determined in the Millikan experiment?

In the Millikan experiment, tiny oil droplets were suspended in an electric field. By measuring the motion of these droplets, Millikan was able to calculate the charge on each droplet and determine the charge of a single electron.

How accurate is the Millikan oil drop experiment?

The Millikan oil drop experiment is considered to be one of the most accurate experiments in the history of science, with a reported accuracy of 0.3%. However, there has been some controversy surrounding the accuracy of the experiment and the reported results.

Why is the Millikan oil drop experiment important?

The Millikan oil drop experiment is important because it provided the first accurate measurement of the charge of a single electron, which is a fundamental unit of electricity. This experiment also helped to confirm the quantization of electric charge, which is a key concept in modern physics.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
781
Back
Top