MechRocket
- 14
- 0
The answer to my Kaplan test (studying for the DAT, just FYI) says 3, but I think it's 4?
Am I wrong?
Am I wrong?
The discussion revolves around the number of equivalent hydrogens in octane, specifically focusing on n-octane and the concept of non-equivalent hydrogens. Participants explore the implications for NMR shifts and the substitution test for determining hydrogen equivalence.
Participants express differing views on the number of non-equivalent hydrogens in n-octane, with some asserting there are 4 while others argue that only 3 are relevant for NMR analysis. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these distinctions.
There is uncertainty regarding the ability of current NMR technology to distinguish between the chemical shifts of hydrogens on different carbons in n-octane, and the discussion does not clarify the assumptions behind the substitution test or the conditions under which the equivalence is assessed.
SpectraCat said:To which structural isomer of octane are you referring? And do you mean non-equivalent hydrogens?
Assuming you mean n-octane, I think you are correct in principle that there are 4 kinds .. in other words, if you use the substitution test, you can create 4 distinct molecules by substituting a single H-atom with an F-atom. However, for the purpose of determining NMR shifts in alkanes (which I assume is what you are asking about), I am fairly sure that only the nearest-neighbor groups matter. Assuming that is true, can you now see why n-octane has only 3 non-equivalent types of hydrogens?
sjb-2812 said:I'd be inclined to disagree there, even for NMR, though for e.g. distinguishing between 3- and 4-halooctanes there may not be that much of a difference in shift, in principle this still exists.