How Many Layers of Aluminum Foil Are Needed for a Resonant Cavity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on constructing a resonant cavity for frequencies between 100-700 MHz using aluminum foil. Participants emphasize that a single layer of aluminum foil may suffice from an RF perspective, but recommend using copper foil for better conductivity due to aluminum's insulating oxide layer. The importance of mechanical stability is highlighted, as variations in the cavity's structure can affect resonance. A skin depth calculator is referenced, indicating that both aluminum and copper can achieve the necessary thickness for effective operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resonant cavity design principles
  • Familiarity with RF (Radio Frequency) concepts
  • Knowledge of skin depth calculations in conductive materials
  • Experience with materials like aluminum and copper for RF applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "skin depth" calculations for different materials at various frequencies
  • Explore the mechanical design requirements for resonant cavities
  • Learn about soldering techniques for copper foil to ensure conductivity
  • Investigate alternative materials and their properties for RF applications
USEFUL FOR

Electronics hobbyists, RF engineers, and anyone interested in building resonant cavities for frequency experimentation will benefit from this discussion.

kiutukri
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I want to build a Resonant Cavity to play with frequencies around 100-700 mhz. I'd like to try different shapes, so I was thinking in using a cheap malleable material like aluminum foil.

Questions:

- I think one layer of aluminum foil might be too thin.. If I paste a couple of layers will do the job?

- How to calculate the thickness?

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kiutukri said:
I want to build a Resonant Cavity to play with frequencies around 100-700 mhz.

so you really want to build a whole bunch of cavities ?
you do realize that a cavity resonant at 100 MHz isn't going to be resonant at 200 MHz, 500 MHz or 700 MHz etc

Do you also realize how big a resonant cavity is at 100 MHz ?
just an approximate ... one for 146 MHz is around 3-4 ft long and ~ 5 inches in diameter

kiutukri said:
so I was thinking in using a cheap malleable material like aluminium foil.

So what were you going to put the foil against for support ? ( one layer from an RF point of view would be ok)
Brass tubes are the commonly used method for cavities. Have used 100's of commercial ones over the years
for VHF - UHF repeater installationsThere's lots of design info on google ... have some fun learning about them :smile:Dave
 
davenn said:
so you really want to build a whole bunch of cavities ?
you do realize that a cavity resonant at 100 MHz isn't going to be resonant at 200 MHz, 500 MHz or 700 MHz etc

Do you also realize how big a resonant cavity is at 100 MHz ?
just an approximate ... one for 146 MHz is around 3-4 ft long and ~ 5 inches in diameter
So what were you going to put the foil against for support ? ( one layer from an RF point of view would be ok)
Brass tubes are the commonly used method for cavities. Have used 100's of commercial ones over the years
for VHF - UHF repeater installationsThere's lots of design info on google ... have some fun learning about them :smile:Dave

Hi, Dave,
Thank you for your answer. I'll start building just one then I'll see.
Yes I do realize, that's one of the reasons I want to use a flexible material so I can fold it when I'm not using it. I'm planning to use wood as support, like a canvas frame.

What about my questions?

- I think one layer of aluminum foil might be too thin.. If I paste a couple of layers will do the job?
- How to calculate the thickness?

Thanks.
 
Very thin. Search "skin depth" and calculate it--you can let us know what you find.

You'll have a much bigger problem with the seams, because of the insulating oxide layer on aluminum. Use copper foil instead and solder the seams to get good conductivity all around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
marcusl said:
You'll have a much bigger problem with the seams, because of the insulating oxide layer on aluminum. Use copper foil instead and solder the seams to get good conductivity all around.

yup agree totally ... the inside of the cavity cannot have any breaks in the surface ... it must be electrically continuous

kiutukri said:
Yes I do realize, that's one of the reasons I want to use a flexible material so I can fold it when I'm not using it. I'm planning to use wood as support, like a canvas frame.

I really don't think that is going to be feasible. The cavities need to be sturdy because any variations will cause changes in the resonance of the cavity

Dave
 
marcusl said:
Very thin. Search "skin depth" and calculate it--you can let us know what you find.

You'll have a much bigger problem with the seams, because of the insulating oxide layer on aluminum. Use copper foil instead and solder the seams to get good conductivity all around.

Hi Marcus,

Thank you for your awesome answer.

I've found this online calculator http://www.rfcafe.com/references/calculators/skin-depth-calculator.htm

According to this, using Copper, for 100 mhz I'll only need a skin depth of: 6.54 μmeters or 257.59 μinches. A thickness of 0.006543 mm sounds totally doable to me.

Even aluminum could do it: 8.19 μmeters, 0.00819 mm. The thickness of a standard aluminum foil is 0.016 mm

I am doing something wrong? o_O
 
kiutukri said:
According to this, using Copper, for 100 mhz I'll only need a skin depth of: 6.54 μmeters or 257.59 μinches. A thickness of 0.006543 mm sounds totally doable to me.

Even aluminum could do it: 8.19 μmeters, 0.00819 mm. The thickness of a standard aluminum foil is 0.016 mm

yes, skin depth and the thickness of the aluminium foil isn't a problem and it isn't YOUR problem

Your problem lies in the last part of my last post, which you have yet to acknowledgeDave
 
davenn said:
yes, skin depth and the thickness of the aluminium foil isn't a problem and it isn't YOUR problem

Your problem lies in the last part of my last post, which you have yet to acknowledgeDave

Is there any way to calculate that?
 
kiutukri said:
Is there any way to calculate that?

why, there's no need ... you already have done so anyway

and as I said, it isn't the problem you need to solve ... you problem is going to be all mechanical
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
744
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
983
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
5K