How many trips will the box make before coming to rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter octahedron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work-energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a 5.0 kg box sliding down a frictionless hill and interacting with a rough surface and a spring. Key calculations include the box's speed just before the rough surface (9.39 m/s) and the spring compression (0.959 m). The main challenge addressed is determining how many complete trips the box makes across the rough surface before coming to rest, which is solved using the work-energy principle and results in 10 trips. The work done by friction is the only non-conservative force considered in this analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle
  • Knowledge of kinetic and potential energy calculations
  • Familiarity with friction and its effects on motion
  • Basic concepts of springs and Hooke's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about the effects of friction on kinetic energy
  • Explore Hooke's law and spring potential energy
  • Investigate energy conservation in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of energy conservation and friction in motion.

octahedron
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5.0 kg box slides down a 5-m-high frictionless hill, starting from rest, across a 2-m-long horizontal surface, then hits a horizontal spring with spring constant 500 N/m. The other end of the spring is frictionless, but the 2.0-m-long horizontal surface is rough. The coefficient of kinetic friction of the box on this surface is 0.25.

(a) What is the speed of the box just before reaching the rough surface?
(b) What is the speed of the box just before hitting the spring?
(c) How far is the spring compressed?
(d) Including the first crossing, how many complete trips will the box make across the rough surface before coming to rest?

Homework Equations



W_nc = delta-E

The Attempt at a Solution



So I actually solved (a)-(c) using non-conservative work and delta energy. My solutions for (a)-(c), if that would help, were

(a) 9.9 m/s
(b) 9.39 m/s
(c) 0.959 m

However I honestly haven't a clue as to how to approach (d) besides the "obvious" long way by going through the velocities over and over again until it reaches zero. Any elegant way here?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, use energy... the work done by friction is the same each time the object crosses the rough surface. Use the initial energy... and the work by friction per trip across the rough surface... to get the number of trips before energy of the box becomes zero.
 
I think its even a better idea if you use the kinetic energy of the box just before hitting the rough surface since you are including the first crossing too.
Like learningphysics said:
- Find you how much work it takes each time (its going to be the same) the box crosses the rough surface
W = f*d = mu*N(normal)*d
- Use the kinetic energy of the box just before hitting the surface (Ek = mv^2/2)
Then C*W = Ek where C is the constant (number of times it crosses the rough surface)
 
I was having trouble with part d of this problem, as well. Thank you Hells_Kitchen and LearningPhysics for your help.

However, I'm still confused. Why is it that we don't need to worry about the work the spring does or the work that gravity does? Why is it that Wnet is just the work done by friction?

Thank you!
 
Notice that the work done by the frictional force is not merely W_{net} but the work done by nonconservative forces W_{nc}, and since the spring and gravitational forces are not nonconservative, they are not factored in the calculation.

Then it follows that W_{nc} = \Delta E, and you use energy done throughout the work completed to obtain the \total\ distance traveled across the rough surface.

Thanks everybody; I used learningphysics's method and got the correct answer, which is 10 times.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, Octahedron. It all makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K