MHB How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nari
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of ways to draw 3 cards of one suit and 2 cards of another from a standard 52-card deck, the calculation involves three components: C(13, 3) for choosing 3 cards from one suit, C(13, 2) for choosing 2 cards from another suit, and C(4, 2) for selecting which two suits to use. The last component is crucial because it accounts for the different suit combinations, ensuring that combinations like 3 hearts and 2 spades are distinguished from 3 spades and 2 hearts. The initial calculations do not specify suits, hence the need for the additional factor. Understanding this distinction clarifies the overall counting method.
nari
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am completing a practice exam and there is this answer to a question that I do not understand. It says:

An experiment consists of drawing a hand of 5 cards from a standard deck of 52 cards. How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

I thought it was C(13, 3) x C(13,2). But it turns out it is C(13, 3) x C(13,2) x C(4,2). I don't understand where that last bit comes from. I know there are 4 suits, so I am guessing that bit is choosing two suits out of the four, but why is that not redundant when considering the first two parts of the answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nari said:
Hi! I am completing a practice exam and there is this answer to a question that I do not understand. It says:

An experiment consists of drawing a hand of 5 cards from a standard deck of 52 cards. How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

I thought it was C(13, 3) x C(13,2). But it turns out it is C(13, 3) x C(13,2) x C(4,2). I don't understand where that last bit comes from. I know there are 4 suits, so I am guessing that bit is choosing two suits out of the four, but why is that not redundant when considering the first two parts of the answer?

Hi nari,

Welcome to MHB. :) This is a good question!

The first two parts, C(13, 3) x C(13,2), deal with choosing select cards from a pool in the appropriate way, but say nothing about the suit. For the first term, C(13, 3), this could be any of the 4 suits right? And then for the second expression, C(13,2), this could be from any of the 3 remaining suits. We haven't dealt with the problem of where the 13's come from yet. We are counting 3H2S the same as 3S2D right now.

That's where this last piece comes in. Does that make sense or help?
 
Jameson said:
Hi nari,

Welcome to MHB. :) This is a good question!

The first two parts, C(13, 3) x C(13,2), deal with choosing select cards from a pool in the appropriate way, but say nothing about the suit. For the first term, C(13, 3), this could be any of the 4 suits right? And then for the second expression, C(13,2), this could be from any of the 3 remaining suits. We haven't dealt with the problem of where the 13's come from yet. We are counting 3H2S the same as 3S2D right now.

That's where this last piece comes in. Does that make sense or help?

Yes, it does make sense! Thank you :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top