Graduate How momentum measurement is defined in Pilot Wave interpretation?

Click For Summary
In the pilot wave interpretation, a particle's measurements are determined by its wave function and position, suggesting a realistic framework for understanding observed randomness in accordance with the Born rule. However, defining the momentum of a particle within this interpretation poses challenges, particularly when considering a stationary electron in a hydrogen atom. The pilot wave itself remains unchanged over time, but it guides the particle's motion, allowing for orbital behavior rather than a fixed position. Measurement in Bohmian mechanics alters the wave function, indicating that one cannot apply the wave function from a non-measured state to interpret measurement outcomes. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of reconciling momentum measurement within the pilot wave framework.
MichPod
Messages
231
Reaction score
46
Considering pilot wave interpretation, a singular particle measurements are fully defined (?) by knowing its wave function (a pilot wave) and the position of the "particle" (some hypotetical point particle riding on the wave). This should provide some sort of "realistic" explanation of how a random coordinate may be observed/measured which disribution is in accordance with the Born rule. Yet I fail to see how the momentum of the particle may be defined which will be in accordance with stanard "copenhagen" QM and which will be "realistic". What does pilot wave interpretations say of the momentum measurement?

To take the case to extreme, let's consider a Hydrogen atom with the electron in the ground state. According to the pilot wave interpretation, the electron "particle" will not move (!), staying still at some fixed distance and direction from the proton. Then, for each such position of the "electron particle" is it possible to prescribe a momentum which will be consistent with normal QM? I fill like it is hardly possible for the same reason it is impossible to brush a hairy sphere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After thinking a bit more... my idea with hydrogen atom is probably wrong, it does not disprove pilot wave interpretation.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
MichPod said:
According to the pilot wave interpretation, the electron "particle" will not move (!), staying still at some fixed distance and direction from the proton.

No, it won't. The pilot wave doesn't change with time, but that doesn't mean the particle position doesn't change with time. The pilot wave guides the motion of the particle; in this case it causes it to orbit the proton.
 
MichPod said:
What does pilot wave interpretations say of the momentum measurement?
The most important thing to realize is that measurement (of momentum or anything else) in Bohmian mechanics (as well as in standard QM) significantly changes the wave function. So you cannot understand the results of measurement by using the wave function that is valid in the absence of measurement.
 
Based on the thermal interpretation, I developed a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to propose a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. The proposed theory operates fully within the established mathematical formalism of quantum field theory. The proposed theory unifies the classical and quantum intuition about the macroscopic and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K