How Much Extra Power Is Needed to Maintain Speed on an Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter munkachunka
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the extra power required for a tank to maintain a constant speed while traveling uphill on an incline. The problem involves a tank weighing 80 metric tonnes moving at 54 km/h on level terrain and then transitioning to an incline with a 1 in 10 slope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the tank, including gravitational forces and potential friction, while attempting to calculate the power needed to maintain speed on the incline. There are questions about how to account for friction without specific values and whether the power required on flat terrain is zero.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different perspectives on the calculations, with some suggesting that the power required to maintain speed on flat terrain may be negligible due to the absence of friction. Others are exploring the implications of energy conservation and potential energy changes as the tank moves uphill. There is no clear consensus on the correct approach, and multiple interpretations are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding friction coefficients and the assumptions made about friction being negligible on flat terrain. The problem's complexity is acknowledged, particularly regarding the calculations for power on both flat and inclined surfaces.

munkachunka
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
extra power required to maintain the same speed on an incline

Homework Statement



a tank of 80 metric tonnes is traveling at a uniform speed of 54km/r on level terrain, it the starts traveling uphill on an incline of 1 in 10 sine slope)
Calculate the extra power required from the engine in Megawatts to maintain the same speed on the incline.

Homework Equations



F=M*A
P=F*V
F=(% grade of hill)*M*G

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the power required to go uphill as
F=1/10 * 80000*9.8 = 78400N
therefore power = F*V = 78400*15m/s = 1.176MW

the problem I have is that I can't seam to find an equation to work out the force on the flat which does not have the acceleration variable, do I just put this to 1 and solve that way? which would give a force of 784000N, P=F*V = 784000*15 = 11760000.
take the first answer away from the second which leave a difference in power of 10.584MW.
Really not too sure.
I know of other equations such as Ek=1/2Mv^2 for power to accelerate a vehicle but don't think this is the equation to use,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops... sorry I posted wrongly.. I think you need to calculate friction.
 
Last edited:
can friction be calculated without knowing the proopertys of the road surface?
 
I thought at first, maybe you'd need to consider how the friction changes when it goes up the incline...

Initially...

(F_{engine1} - \mu{m}g)v = 0

Then up the incline

[F_{engine2} - \mu{m}gcos(\theta) - mgsin(\theta)]*v = 0

So then subtracting these two:

F_{engine2}*v - F_{engine1}*v = [(cos\theta-1)\mu{m}g + mgsin(\theta)]*v

I think the (cos\theta-1)\mu{m}g is small enough to be ignored (since they didn't give any \mu for the problem) Also |cos(\theta) - 1|<<<|sin(\theta)| (we have sintheta is 0.1... and I'm getting costheta-1 as -0.005) and \mu < 1 so the first term on the right side is much less than the second...

So I think it's safe to say:

F_{engine2}*v - F_{engine1}*v = mgsin(\theta)*v

So I'd say 1.176MW is correct...
 
You can't "calculate friction" because no information is given about friction that would allow you to do that.

I think I would do this in terms of "conservation of energy". Assuming that velocity is constant, the only change in energy would be the increase in potential energy: mgh. How fast is that changing?
 
to be honest, now I am not sure what is correct now,

I think my answer is correct for the power required to go up the hill (1.176MW), however I don't understand how no power is used to keep the tank moving at a constant speed.

If the answer is 1.176MW could someone please explain in laymans terms.

thankyou
 
munkachunka said:
to be honest, now I am not sure what is correct now,

I think my answer is correct for the power required to go up the hill (1.176MW), however I don't understand how no power is used to keep the tank moving at a constant speed.

If the answer is 1.176MW could someone please explain in laymans terms.

thankyou

Suppose the terrain is completely frictionless... the truck is sliding along the flat terrain at a constant speed of 54km/h... how much power is the engine giving the truck?
 
Ok, so in my answer I can state that, because there is no friction given it is assumed there is no friction when the tank is on the flat, hence the extra power required is the total power required to get the tank up the hill at 54km/hr.

the thing I am a bit dubious about is that there is 10 marks for this
 
munkachunka said:
Ok, so in my answer I can state that, because there is no friction given it is assumed there is no friction when the tank is on the flat, hence the extra power required is the total power required to get the tank up the hill at 54km/hr.

Yeah like that... or say that we must assume the frictional force is the same on the incline as the flat part(or that the difference negligible) since mu is not given...

Basically the idea is that since the truck isn't accelerating, the net force on the truck is 0. Assuming the friction is the same:

Ftruck1 = friction (flat part)
Ftruck2 = friction + mgsintheta (inclined part)

So this way also you get the difference in power as 15*mgsin(theta)
 
  • #10
thankyou very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K