B How Much Mass Required to Demonstrate Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate gravity independent of Earth's influence, an experiment would need to occur in space with sufficient mass to be observable by the naked eye. A minimum mass comparable to that of a planet is necessary for visibility, as smaller masses would not create a noticeable gravitational pull. Historical methods, like the torsion balance used in the Cavendish experiment, highlight the challenges of measuring gravity accurately. Two 10kg masses, if positioned 1 meter apart and initially at rest, would collide within approximately 8 hours, but achieving such precise initial conditions is complex. Ultimately, demonstrating gravity in this manner requires significant mass and careful arrangement to be effective.
Roman Mithman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If one were to demonstrate gravity independent of earth's constant gravity, how could it be done? Assuming this would need to be done in space, what minimum proportions of mass would be required to demonstrate gravitational pull to a human's naked eye?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two 10kg masses 1m apart in space and initially at rest would collide fairly quickly. Setting ##s=\frac 12\frac{GM}{r^2}t^2## gives an upper bound of about 8 hours (remembering each mass only needs to travel ##s=0.5\mathrm{m}##).

Of course, you need to arrange that the masses are initially stationary to better than 0.01mm/s, which is non trivial.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, russ_watters and Roman Mithman
If it needs to be in space, far from the earth, and you need to see it with the unaided eye, it needs to be at least planet-sized. (Note that this is independent of measuring gravity)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top