How much matter goes into making black holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the percentage of matter in the universe that contributes to the formation of black holes. Participants explore various claims, theories, and calculations related to this topic, questioning the validity and reliability of the figures presented, particularly the assertion that 99.9999% of matter goes into making black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Richard Carrier's claim, based on Lee Smolin's work, that 99.9999% of the universe's matter is involved in black hole formation, questioning its truth and calculability.
  • Others emphasize the importance of falsifiability in scientific claims, suggesting that the focus should be on whether such statements can be proven false rather than their truth value.
  • One participant argues that while theories must be falsifiable, specific claims about percentages can be verified, although this claim is reiterated without resolution.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the high percentage of matter going into black holes, suggesting that observational evidence contradicts such a claim, as black holes are detectable through their effects on surrounding stars.
  • Another participant discusses the mass-energy conversion processes in stars, noting that a small fraction of the universe's initial mass survives to become stars and subsequently black holes, implying that the percentage of matter going into black holes is likely much lower than 99.9999%.
  • A later reply clarifies the meaning of "recover" in the context of black holes swallowing matter, expressing interest in the current state of matter that has gone into black holes rather than future projections.
  • One participant cites a source estimating that black holes constitute about 0.0011% of the universe's mass, noting the difficulty in accurately determining this figure and the lack of evidence for a high abundance of individual black holes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the percentage of matter that contributes to black hole formation. Multiple competing views are presented, with some arguing for a very high percentage and others suggesting it is significantly lower.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring the mass of black holes and the challenges in verifying claims about their contribution to the universe's total matter. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of matter and the processes involved in black hole formation.

revo74
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I recently viewed a video with Richard Carrier, who apparently was using information he derived from Lee Smolin. He said that 99.9999% of the matter in the universe goes to making black holes. Is this true? What percentage of matter does go to the making of black holes, is it even something we can calculate and know?
 
Space news on Phys.org
At the heart of Smolin's arguments is the issue of Popper falsifiability. The question should not be "Is this true?", but should be can this be falsified, can it be false? Further, he argues that mathematical calculation is not a reliable guide to truth.
 
Theories (general, universal statements of physical law) must be falsified a la Popper, but particular facts like "99.9999% of the matter in the universe goes to making black holes" can certainly be verified for truth.
 
bapowell said:
Theories (general, universal statements of physical law) must be falsified a la Popper, but particular facts like "99.9999% of the matter in the universe goes to making black holes" can certainly be verified for truth.

Is is true that the percentage of matter in the universe that goes to making black holes is 99.9999% or greater?
 
I am only guessing here, but I presume that what the clever sirs are attempting to say is. Yes, but only on the paper, please correct me if I am wrong.
one of the possible arguments against this statement "black holes amount of matter = 99.999999% of matter in the universe" is that we are capable of observing black holes with telescopes, we observe them through watching the orbits of stars around black holes.

http://www.ted.com/talks/andrea_ghez_the_hunt_for_a_supermassive_black_hole
mighty fine explanation of the hunt for black holes, what they are and such.
 
Stars convert mass into photons over their lifetimes. The hydrogen fusion process converts about 0.7% of the mass involved into photons in a typical [sun-like] star. The amount of mass available for fusion in such a star is about 0.1 solar masses, so we can conclude that about 0.07% of the total mass is converted to photons over the lifetime of a typical sun-like star. This, however, fails to account for mass-energy conversion in the infant universe, which produced the CMB photons. The baryon asymmetry of the infant universe is estimated at about 1 part in 10 billion. Since matter-antimatter energy conversion is virtually 100% efficient, the matter that survived to become stars was only a microscopic fraction of the initial mass budget of the universe. While black holes may recover 99.9999% of all matter that remains after mass-energy conversion processes have ended in the universe, I doubt they will recover 99.9999% of all photons emitted over the history of the universe.
 
Chronos said:
Stars convert mass into photons over their lifetimes. The hydrogen fusion process converts about 0.7% of the mass involved into photons in a typical [sun-like] star. The amount of mass available for fusion in such a star is about 0.1 solar masses, so we can conclude that about 0.07% of the total mass is converted to photons over the lifetime of a typical sun-like star. This, however, fails to account for mass-energy conversion in the infant universe, which produced the CMB photons. The baryon asymmetry of the infant universe is estimated at about 1 part in 10 billion. Since matter-antimatter energy conversion is virtually 100% efficient, the matter that survived to become stars was only a microscopic fraction of the initial mass budget of the universe. While black holes may recover 99.9999% of all matter that remains after mass-energy conversion processes have ended in the universe, I doubt they will recover 99.9999% of all photons emitted over the history of the universe.

When you say "recover" are you essentially meaning the matter swallowed by black holes. It also appears you're suggesting that when the universe reaches heat-death the black holes in the universe at that time will have swallowed/recovered 99.9999% of the remaining matter remaining from the mass-energy conversion processes. I am more interested in the universe in its present state. How much matter in the universe up until now has gone into making black holes?
 
The best guess at present is black holes constitute about 0.0011% of the mass of the universe - re: http://www.universetoday.com/112500/how-much-of-the-universe-is-black-holes/. Note that his is just a guess. Putting a number to the collective mass of black holes in the universe is not an easy task. We can somewhat safely say that individual black holes are not wildly abundant because gravitational lensing events are not evident all across the sky.
 
  • #10
Quite coincidentally I noticed this thread while napping through
Apparently Juan Maldecena is in the audience.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nuradh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K