How Much Physics Can You Feasibly Learn When Self-Studying?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of learning physics through self-study, particularly focusing on the challenges and strategies involved in mastering concepts, equations, and problem-solving techniques. Participants share their experiences with textbooks, derivations, and the breadth of material in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses enthusiasm for learning physics through a textbook, emphasizing the importance of understanding derivations before moving on.
  • Another participant argues that many equations are easy to derive from basic principles and questions the necessity of listing multiple forms of the same equation.
  • A participant notes that graduate students often keep undergraduate textbooks handy for reference, suggesting that a solid grasp of the basics is crucial for tackling advanced topics.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding concepts and derivations makes solving problems easier, as indicated by one participant's experience with a specific textbook.
  • One participant compares learning physics to learning languages, suggesting that gradual exposure and practice are key to mastery.
  • A recommendation is made for the inclusion of a calculus book, highlighting its importance as the foundational language of physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of physics equations and the necessity of memorizing them. While some believe that many equations are manageable and can be derived, others emphasize the vastness of the subject and the need for specialization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach to learning physics and the extent of material that should be covered.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various textbooks and methods of study, but there is no consensus on which specific resources or strategies are most effective for self-study in physics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals considering self-studying physics, those seeking advice on textbooks and study methods, and learners looking for community support in their educational journey.

gibberingmouther
Messages
120
Reaction score
15
i started out learning physics for fun with maxwell's equations because partially i wanted to expand my understanding of electronics. i spiderwebbed around on the internet trying to learn the math to understand the equations. i learned some things but i still didn't have it all down before i decided last Friday to start going through a physics textbook i own. I've been making good progress since then working on it each day. i make sure to understand the derivation (algebraically, graphically, and conceptually - whatever that may mean exactly) before i move on to the next thing. so far i have gotten to the section on conservation of momentum and collisions. I've still got momentum (lol) so I'm going to keep going. it's fun! and i still have to take physics for my major so it'll help with that as well.

i'm on page 263 of an approximately 1500 page textbook. i know there's a lot to learn. after you've studied a certain amount of physics and math you develop a familiarity with it. i guess people who go on to do original work in physics (like for a phd) develop that familiarity and know just enough to extrapolate and do some new research? that's kind of how i imagine it working would you guys who know say that is accurate?

anyway, the idea for this thread came from those considerations and finally from looking at this link that contains a list of equations: https://physics.info/equations/

i mean, holy crap! that's a lot of equations. how much of it is feasible to learn? do you skip certain parts of it, like optics let's say, because you don't really need to know it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gibberingmouther said:
holy crap! that's a lot of equations.

It is not. Many of them are quite easy to derive from the basic principles. Some of them are plain stupid IMHO, it doesn't make sense to list two different forms when one is perfectly sufficient, as the other follows from the definition of the average value.

You don't have to remember how much is 345*876, it is enough to learn the basic multiplication table and methods to multiply any two numbers.

At the same time - there are way more equations, as many problems can be tackled using different methods. As long as they give the same result they are perfectly valid, but they can be quite different when it comes to methodology and calculations, and sometimes choosing the right approach is half of the success. But I doubt anyone knows them all, in every branch o physics, that's where specialization comes into play.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gibberingmouther
Most graduate students I know keep a copy of major undergrad textbooks in their offices - there are always equations and concepts that you don't know, but that you can look up if necessary. I would partially agree that people who do "original work" in physics do have a familiarity with physics, but it's not some vague familiarity with the field in general, but a solid knowledge of the basics.

Here's an example - yesterday, for some work I'm doing, I was reading up on piezoelectric materials (their electrical properties change if you squeeze them, for instance). Because in undergrad I learned about how electric dipoles work and how atoms are arranged in different materials, understanding the concept took me 30 seconds. If I didn't have a firm knowledge of the basics, then encountering something outside my field of study would have crippled me.

I'm curious, can you tell us which textbook you are using? There are a standard few textbooks that we recommend here at PF for self-studying physics, and you might be making your life more difficult than necessary :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gibberingmouther
Dishsoap said:
I'm curious, can you tell us which textbook you are using? There are a standard few textbooks that we recommend here at PF for self-studying physics, and you might be making your life more difficult than necessary :)
i'm using Sears and Zemansky's "University Physics with Modern Physics". i like it a lot so far. i still use the internet for some things, like if i need more context about a derivation. I've done some of the problems (there are good already solved example problems in the book as well as many other suggested exercises). it seems like if you understand the concepts and equation derivations, doing the problems is not hard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
gibberingmouther said:
holy crap! that's a lot of equations
I agree with Borek: it's not much. And if you keep going the way you do you'll agree after a while. It's like learning languages: you don't read dictionaries from cover to cover, and a grammar isn't pleasant reading either. You laern a few things that help you learn other things and gradually you can read simple texts, then more complicated stuff. But the best way is to listen and talk -- projected on physics: read the text and do the exercises. PF is here for you when you get stuck :smile:

Hats off for your enterprise :cool: !

Good luck !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gibberingmouther
You should have a calculus book as well. Calculus is the language of physics, learn it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
15K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K