How Much Physics is Involved in an M.D. in Radiology?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amru123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Radiology integrates both physics and biology, but the majority of research in this field is conducted from a clinical perspective by radiologists. Medical physicists and bioengineers primarily focus on developing new imaging techniques and hardware. For those interested in the application of physics to medicine, pursuing an M.D. may not be the most efficient path, as additional scientific or engineering education is often necessary. A strong background in hard sciences is beneficial for contributing to advancements in radiology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of medical imaging techniques
  • Knowledge of clinical efficacy in disease diagnosis
  • Familiarity with medical physics principles
  • Background in bioengineering or hard sciences
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of medical physicists in radiology
  • Explore advanced imaging techniques in radiology
  • Investigate the intersection of physics and biology in medical applications
  • Learn about the educational pathways for bioengineers in healthcare
USEFUL FOR

Medical students, aspiring radiologists, medical physicists, and bioengineers interested in the intersection of physics and medicine will benefit from this discussion.

Amru123
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
I have this kind of wish to do research on fields related to physics.I am interested in biology also.I read somewhere that radiology is a combination of both physics and biology.If so how much of radiology is physics and will I be able to do my wish of research if I get an M.D in Radiology?
P.S I am currently working for getting into a good med school.So any guidance about how I could go about is welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amru123 said:
If so how much of radiology is physics and will I be able to do my wish of research if I get an M.D in Radiology?

I am a retired medical physicist and while I have not participated directly in much research I have been able to observe the development of most of the state of the art techniques and instrumentation over the last thirty years. .Radiology is a branch of medicine first and foremost. Research in Radiology i.e. imaging is usually done from a clinical point of view by radiologists. Radiologists primarily study the clinical efficacy of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of disease processes.. Research into new imaging techniques or hardware is usually done by physicists (medical physicists) and engineers (bioengineers) although physicians often do participate. Physicians who contribute the most usually have a hard science degree.which might be anything from a BS to a PhD. The point is that if you are interested in application of physics to medicine or biology getting an MD is the hard way to do it since you will still the the science and/or engineering on top of the MD.
 
gleem said:
The point is that if you are interested in application of physics to medicine or biology getting an MD is the hard way to do it since you will still the the science and/or engineering on top of the MD.
Now I get it.I've been in a false opinion all these days.Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
739
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
652