How much power is needed to ride a conveyor belt into space?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Emanresu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical power requirements for using a conveyor belt to transport a person into space. It explores the mechanics of lifting mass against gravity and the implications of speed and efficiency in such a system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that a frictionless conveyor belt could transport a 100kg person into space at a speed of 1m/s, requiring only 1kW of power to counteract gravity.
  • Another participant agrees that the power required is independent of height and solely depends on speed, equating it to the energy needed to run up stairs at the same vertical speed.
  • A third participant emphasizes the efficiency of space elevators, suggesting that if more mass descends than ascends, the system could generate power.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of reaching orbit, noting that while riding to low Earth orbit might be feasible, achieving geostationary orbit would require an impractically long duration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the power calculations for lifting mass against gravity, but there is a divergence regarding the feasibility and practicality of using a conveyor belt for orbital travel, particularly concerning the time required to reach higher altitudes.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in the mechanics of a conveyor belt system in space, such as the energy required to accelerate the entire system or the implications of orbital mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in theoretical physics, engineering concepts related to space travel, and discussions on innovative transportation methods may find this discussion relevant.

Emanresu
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a frictionless and perfectly balanced conveyor belt going into space (and back). The belt is driven by a motor on earth. Suppose you want to send a person who weighs 100kg into space and you boost them onto the conveyor belt at 1m/s with the conveyor belt running at 1m/s (the boost is independent of the conveyor belt so it does not have to accelerate them). To maintain that velocity of 1m/s requires a force opposite to that of gravity which is approx. 1000N. Because Power = Fv does that mean that the motor must only generate a power of 1KW (1000N x 1m/s) ? i.e. with this configuration you can get into space with very little power if you are prepared to go slowly enough ?

E.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the power doesn't depend on the height only the speed.
You are lifiting 100Kg ( 1000N) through 1m every second so it takes just 1kW.
Exactly the same as it would take you to run up stairs at 1 (vertical)m/s.

Space elevators are a very fuel efficent way of getting into space. If you have more mass coming down than going up they atually generate power!
 
Yep. The mass in question only takes 1KW.

Space elevators are one of the more efficient and "green" methods for getting cargo to and from orbit.

The real trick is in getting the elevator to work in the first place vis-a-vis accelerating the mass of the entire ribbon up to the 1m/s traveling speed. The amount of energy it takes to lift cargo is trivial compared to the amount of kinetic energy tied up in the ribbon itself.
 
You could get into space this way pretty easily, but getting into orbit would be a lot tougher. Just riding it to low Earth orbit altitude (about 200 km) doesn't accomplish you anything. Getting to geostationary orbit, iirc, is about 40,000 km up, so you'd have to ride this conveyor for 1.3 years to get there. So pack a hearty lunch.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K