How Plaque Reduces Artery Radius: Calculating with Poiseuille's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyberdx16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the reduction in artery radius due to plaque formation using Poiseuille's Law. When the flow rate in an artery decreases to 30% of its normal value and the pressure difference increases by 30%, the radius of the artery is reduced by 14.4%. The correct formula applied is R=(0.3/1.3)^0.25, confirming that only 85.6% of the original radius remains. The implications of occlusion reaching 80% are also highlighted, indicating significant health risks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poiseuille's Law
  • Basic knowledge of fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with pressure and flow rate concepts
  • Ability to perform exponentiation and basic algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Poiseuille's Law in cardiovascular physiology
  • Research the impact of arterial occlusion on blood flow and oxygen delivery
  • Explore advanced fluid dynamics concepts related to vascular health
  • Learn about diagnostic techniques for assessing arterial blockages
USEFUL FOR

Medical students, healthcare professionals, and researchers interested in cardiovascular health and the effects of arterial plaque on blood flow dynamics.

cyberdx16
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When physicians diagnose arterial blockages, they quote the reduction in flow rate. If the flow rate in an artery has been reduced to 30% of its normal value due to plaque formation, and the average pressure difference has increased by 30%, by what factor has the plaque reduced the radius of the artery?


Homework Equations



Poiseuille's Law.

The Attempt at a Solution



what i used was R=(.7/1.3)^.25 and get that only 85.6% of the radius of the artery is available, and has been reduced by 14.4%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you want to use .3 in the numerator, ie

flow is now 30 percent of original, not been reduced by 30%
 
Last edited:
wouldn't the presure rate be increased by .3 so from its original, which is 1 and add .3 for the increase. But yeah i just tried .3 and it didnt work
 
Its both .3 and 1.3, (.3/1.3)^.25 is that what you tried?
 
yeah you are right denverdoc! thx
 
NP. FYI when occlusion reaches 80 percent and above, bad news. This guy has lost some exercise tolerance but still in decent shape re meeting oxygen demands.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
16K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K