Relating portions of Poiseille's Law to concepts of pressure/radius

  • Thread starter Thread starter oddjobmj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Poiseuille's Law in the context of blood flow through arteries, particularly focusing on how changes in the radius of an artery affect the pressure required to maintain a constant flow rate. The original poster is seeking clarification on the relationship between pressure and radius as described by the equation P/P0 = (R0/R)^4, and how to deduce the implications of reducing the radius to three-fourths of its original value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss equating the flux expressions derived from Poiseuille's Law for initial and reduced radius conditions. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the problem and the relevance of algebraic manipulation in the context of a calculus course.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem by equating the expressions for flux and rearranging to derive the relationship between pressure and radius. There is an acknowledgment of the algebraic nature of the problem, and participants are exploring whether to use specific values or keep the variables in their general form.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion regarding the problem's requirements and the transition from a calculus context to what appears to be an algebraic exercise. There is a specific mention of substituting R = 3/4 R0 into the equations as part of the exploration.

oddjobmj
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


High blood pressure results from constriction of arteries. To maintain a normal flow rate (flux), the heart has to pump harder, thus increasing the blood pressure. Use Poiseille's Law to show that if R0 and P0 are normal value sof the radius and pressure in an artery and the constricted values are R and P, then for the flux to remain constant, P and R are related by the equation

P/P0 = (R0/R)^4

Deduce that if the radius of an artery is reduced to three-fourths of its former value, then the pressure is more than tripled.


Homework Equations


P/P0 = (R0/R)^4

and what I know of Poiseille's Law

F = ((pi)(P)(R^4))/((8)(n)(l))

Where R=volume, P=pressure, l=length of blood vessel, F=flux, and n=viscosity of blood

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, I've worded and formatted the question exactly as listed. I did this because I'm a little confused at what it's even asking me to do. Does it read like there are two parts; 1) Proving P and R are related by the given equation and 2) deducing the given specific relationship between a change in radius and a change in volume?

I really don't know where to start. I don't want the answer given to me but any hints on how to get started and what they're really asking me for would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so the initial radius R0 and pressure P0 give a flux F
F = \frac{\pi P_0 R_0^4}{8nl}

we assume at a new reduced radius R, we can find a pressure P which gives the same flux F
F = \frac{\pi P R^4}{8nl}

now equate the RHS of each and rearrange to get P/P0
 
Thank you for your reply Lanedance. The way you worded it makes much more sense. However, I'm not sure what you mean by RHS.

Two instances of the equivilant of F will result in all known variables to cancel out on both sides leaving the variables we're working with. Now I see how they derive the first equation I listed. Now if I plug in some reasonable values I can solve for the unknown.

I guess I'm mostly confused because this now seems like a rather simple algebra problem and this is a calculus II class.

EDIT: Also, would you recommend I place reasonable values for R and P in and solve or should I leave it as is with all the variables?
 
Last edited:
yeah it looks like algebra mainly to me

RHS - right hand side

personally i always prefer to leave the variables in until the last step or as late as possible. I find it more flexible & more audiatble

the question asks you to subsititute in R = \frac{3}{4}R_0
 
Awesome, after inserting the 3/4 and adjusting all to the RHS I essentially came down to 256/81=P/4000 (4000=P0, the value I picked as a common P value; used in a previous example).

Then I simply said 256/81 > 3 and did a little explaining.

Thank you for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K