How should I show that solutions can be expressed as a Fourier series?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing solutions of the differential equation ## \ddot{x}+x=0 ## as a Fourier series. The general solution is derived as ## x(t)=A\sin\omega t ##, with the initial condition leading to the conclusion that ## B=0 ##. Participants suggest substituting the Fourier series form ## x(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}B_{2k-1}\sin((2k-1)\omega t) ## into the differential equation to analyze the relationship between ## \omega ## and the coefficients ## B_{2k-1} ##. This approach aims to demonstrate how solutions with angular frequency can be represented in Fourier series format. The discussion emphasizes the need for further exploration of the coefficients and their implications for the solution's periodicity.
Math100
Messages
816
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
Consider the equation ## \ddot{x}+x+\epsilon(\alpha x^2\operatorname{sgn}(x)+\beta x^3)=0, 0<\epsilon<<1, \alpha>0, \beta>0 ##, where ## \alpha ## and ## \beta ## are constants, and the signum function, ## \operatorname{sgn}(x) ##, is defined by ## \operatorname{sgn}(x)=1 ## for ## x>0 ##, ## \operatorname{sgn}(x)=0 ## for ## x=0 ## and ## \operatorname{sgn}(x)=-1 ## for ## x<0 ##. With initial condition ## x(0)=0 ##, show that solutions with angular frequency ## \omega ## can be expressed as a Fourier series of the form ## x(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}B_{2k-1}\sin((2k-1)\omega t)=B_{1}\sin\omega t+B_{3}\sin 3\omega t+\cdots ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Let ## \epsilon=0 ##.
Then the unperturbed equation is ## \ddot{x}+x=0 ## and the general solution is
## x(t)=A\sin\omega t+B\cos\omega t ## where ## \omega=1 ## is the angular frequency
with the constants ## A ## and ## B ##.
With the initial condition ## x(0)=0 ##, we have that ## B=0 ##.
This gives ## x(t)=A\sin\omega t ## where ## A ## is a constant.
Note that the function of ## x(t)=A\sin\omega t ## is periodic and odd.

From the work/proof shown above, how should I show that solutions with angular frequency ## \omega ##
can be expressed as a Fourier series of the given form on the problem? What needs to be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
From the work/proof shown above, how should I show that solutions with angular frequency ## \omega ##
can be expressed as a Fourier series of the given form on the problem? What needs to be done?
Can you show the work you've done on this problem so far?
 
renormalize said:
Can you show the work you've done on this problem so far?
That's all the work I have so far.
 
Math100 said:
That's all the work I have so far.
OK, can you substitute the form ##x(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}B_{2k-1}\sin((2k-1)\omega t)=B_{1}\sin\omega t+B_{3}\sin 3\omega t+\cdots## into the differential equation to see what you can learn about ##\omega## and the coefficients ##B_{2k-1}##?
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...