How Should You Round Photon Energy Changes in Physics Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cupcake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of photon energy changes related to a photon scattering event. The original poster presents a problem involving a photon of a specific wavelength and its interaction with a free electron, leading to questions about rounding and significant figures in energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the significance of rounding in energy calculations, particularly in relation to significant figures derived from the given wavelength. There are inquiries about the appropriate level of precision for reporting energy values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the implications of significant figures on the calculated energies. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of full precision in calculations, while others seek clarification on how to report the final energy change accurately.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of significant figures based on the initial wavelength provided, which is noted to have three significant figures. There is an emphasis on the potential impact of rounding errors on the final reported values.

cupcake
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
please help me,, Mastering physic.. rounding number :(

A photon of wavelength 4.38×10^−2 nm strikes a free electron and is scattered at an angle of 38.0 degree from its original direction.

Find the wavelength of the scattered light.
and my answer is this 4.43×10−2 nm (correct answer)

Find the change in energy of the photon.

E= hc / lambda1 = 1.24*10^-6 / (0.0438*10^-9) = 28310.50 eV

E= hc/ lambda2 = 1.24*10^-6 / (0.0443*10^-9) = 27990.97

and the change in energy is 319.529..
i have tried to enter 319 or 320 but mastering physics gave me

"Not quite. Check through your calculations; you may have made a rounding error or used the wrong number of significant figures."

please help to round this... TT

***hate mastering physics...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since the wavelength was given to 3 significant figures, the energies are each known to 3 significant figures.

This makes the two energies accurate to the nearest ___ eV.

Does that help?
 


Redbelly98 said:
This makes the two energies accurate to the nearest ___ eV.

Does that help?

what did you mean by the nearest ____ eV??

so, what number should i enter?
320 and 319 don't help much...

i already lost some points because of it.. :(
 


cupcake said:
E= hc/ lambda2 = 1.24*10^-6 / (0.0443*10^-9) = 27990.97

If I understand correctly you have used rounded down 443 to calculate energy here - you should use whatever came out from the calculator. Use full precision when calculating, rounded down values are for reporting only.
 


cupcake said:
what did you mean by the nearest ____ eV??
I mean, is it accurate to the nearest 1eV, 10eV, 100eV, or what? Remember, we're using 3 significant figures here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K