How small for perturbation theory to be valid?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 4K views
czaroffishies
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in the ground state in the harmonic oscillator potential

V(x) = [tex]\frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}[/tex]

A small perturbation [tex]\beta x^{6}[/tex] is added to this potential.

How small must [tex]\beta[/tex] be in order for perturbation theory to be valid?

Homework Equations



All here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pertur...chanics)#Time-independent_perturbation_theory

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, this is kind of a conceptual question, and I'm not sure how to start. It feels like I am guessing.

All I know is that:

[tex]\beta x^{6} << \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}[/tex]

I would really appreciate a pointer in the right direction... thanks =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
czaroffishies said:

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in the ground state in the harmonic oscillator potential

V(x) = [tex]\frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}[/tex]

A small perturbation [tex]\beta x^{6}[/tex] is added to this potential.

How small must [tex]\beta[/tex] be in order for perturbation theory to be valid?

Homework Equations



All here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pertur...chanics)#Time-independent_perturbation_theory

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, this is kind of a conceptual question, and I'm not sure how to start. It feels like I am guessing.

All I know is that:

[tex]\beta x^{6} << \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}[/tex]

I would really appreciate a pointer in the right direction... thanks =)

Well, these are operators so it is not well-defined to write an inequality between operators.
What you must do is impose that the first order correction to the energy due to the perturbation must much smaller than the unperturbed energies.