MHB How Tall are Buildings A and B Using Trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Buildings A and B are across the street from each other, 35m apart. From a point on the roof of Building A, the angle of elevation to the top of Building B is 24°, and the angle of depression of the base of Building B is 34°. How tall is each building?

Let x = height of building A.

tan(34°) = x/35

tan(34°)(35) = x

23.61 m = x

I will round off to the nearest ones to get 24 m = x.

Let y = height of building B.

tan(24°) = y/35

tan(24°)(35) = y

15.6 = y

I will round to the nearest ones to get 16 m = y.

Building A is 24 meters tall.
Building B is (24 + 16) or 40 m.

Is any of this right? I have a few more questions to post throughout the day. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi xyz_1965, welcome to MHB!

Yes, your answers to both parts of the problem are correct, well done! Just that if I were you, I would not round the answers to the nearest integer, I would keep both answers correct to 1 or 2 decimal places to avoid round-off error.
 
anemone said:
Hi xyz_1965, welcome to MHB!

Yes, your answers to both parts of the problem are correct, well done! Just that if I were you, I would not round the answers to the nearest integer, I would keep both answers correct to 1 or 2 decimal places to avoid round-off error.

Thanks for the tip.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top