MHB How Tall are Buildings A and B Using Trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
AI Thread Summary
Buildings A and B are 35 meters apart, with Building A's height calculated using the angle of depression to Building B's base at 34°, resulting in a height of 24 meters. The height of Building B is determined using the angle of elevation from Building A's roof at 24°, yielding a height of 16 meters. Therefore, Building B's total height is 40 meters. The calculations are confirmed to be correct, but it is advised to retain decimal precision to minimize rounding errors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accuracy in trigonometric calculations.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Buildings A and B are across the street from each other, 35m apart. From a point on the roof of Building A, the angle of elevation to the top of Building B is 24°, and the angle of depression of the base of Building B is 34°. How tall is each building?

Let x = height of building A.

tan(34°) = x/35

tan(34°)(35) = x

23.61 m = x

I will round off to the nearest ones to get 24 m = x.

Let y = height of building B.

tan(24°) = y/35

tan(24°)(35) = y

15.6 = y

I will round to the nearest ones to get 16 m = y.

Building A is 24 meters tall.
Building B is (24 + 16) or 40 m.

Is any of this right? I have a few more questions to post throughout the day. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi xyz_1965, welcome to MHB!

Yes, your answers to both parts of the problem are correct, well done! Just that if I were you, I would not round the answers to the nearest integer, I would keep both answers correct to 1 or 2 decimal places to avoid round-off error.
 
anemone said:
Hi xyz_1965, welcome to MHB!

Yes, your answers to both parts of the problem are correct, well done! Just that if I were you, I would not round the answers to the nearest integer, I would keep both answers correct to 1 or 2 decimal places to avoid round-off error.

Thanks for the tip.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top