How to Beat a Speeding Ticket for Motorists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a game where participants guess the meanings of obscure jargon terms. The term "green weenie" is identified as a type of air filter used in dirt bikes, while "Hollywood knot" refers to a system for identifying electrical cables on film sets. The conversation continues with various jargon terms, including "harrier," which denotes cross-country runners, and "octopus," a secondary regulator in SCUBA diving. Participants share insights about the meanings and contexts of these terms, often drawing from personal experiences or knowledge in specific fields. The game emphasizes the fun of exploring niche vocabulary and the challenges of finding definitions online. The term "buyback" is discussed in detail, ultimately identified as a drink purchased for someone at a bar, symbolized by an upside-down shot glass. The exchange highlights the social dynamics of drinking culture and the use of jargon in everyday interactions.
  • #251
Industrial heat gun?


[Source: http://www.wagnerspraytech.com/portal/ht3500_en_spray,362095,358970.html]

"Ideal for removing multiple types of paint, remove flooring, rusted bolts, thawing frozen pipes and much more."​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #252
flatmaster said:
Unlike a real hot dog cooker, a weenie roaster produces a nasty smell and warms up something you definitely wouldn't want to eat.

"waste material" (you KNOW what material) furnace?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #253
collinsmark said:
Industrial heat gun?


[Source: http://www.wagnerspraytech.com/portal/ht3500_en_spray,362095,358970.html ]

"Ideal for removing multiple types of paint, remove flooring, rusted bolts, thawing frozen pipes and much more."​

Close enough. A weenie roaster is a PVC heater box. It's a long box heated with a burner or electric element to make the PVC easy to bend. Rollers allow you to rotate the pipe as its heated so its evenly cooked.

http://www.google.com/patents/US6257880

Collinsmark is up
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #254
Okay, I'll try to keep it simple.

The jargon term of the day is: break.

In this context,
  • It is a verb (i.e. an action).
  • It involves certain types of food, among other things.
  • This action is not performed directly by humans (e.g., "let's break for lunch"), but rather the action can happen whether humans are around or not. In the case where it involves food, it's the food that does the breaking. Generally speaking, whatever does the breaking is whatever breaks. (It is possible for humans to indirectly influence breaking. I'm just saying that it's not humans themselves that do the breaking.)
  • Sure, it can be said that an egg can "break" or a potato chip can "break", but that's not what I'm looking for. In the context I'm looking for its meaning is a little different, such that the breaking does not involve a blow, shock or strain.
 
  • #255
Is it fruit in fruit ninja being slashed? Maybe there's a CPU mode in the game
 
  • #256
Office_Shredder said:
Is it fruit in fruit ninja being slashed? Maybe there's a CPU mode in the game

No, it doesn't involve a video/computer game.
 
  • #257
Hints of the Day

  • Perhaps the profession of the most prevalent users of the term break, in context, are chefs and/or cooks. I'm guessing one might hear the term on occasion by watching cooking shows on television. (Do we have any PF members who regularly watch cooking shows? <sarcasm> :smile:)
  • Not all foods can break; only certain types of foods can.
  • The term is not limited to food or the kitchen. Perhaps the profession of the second most prevalent users of the term, in context, are scientists in the laboratory.
 
Last edited:
  • #258
Your clue about the chefs made me think of the process of "cracking" chydorarbons. I think breaking is some sort of chemical change that can happen to food as a result of cooking.

More specifically, my guess is that to break a piece of food is to denature its proteins. This is done most often with heat such as when a runny egg albumen turns solid and white. Breaking can also be done chemically with something acidic like lime juice.
 
  • #259
flatmaster said:
Your clue about the chefs made me think of the process of "cracking" chydorarbons. I think breaking is some sort of chemical change that can happen to food as a result of cooking.

More specifically, my guess is that to break a piece of food is to denature its proteins. This is done most often with heat such as when a runny egg albumen turns solid and white. Breaking can also be done chemically with something acidic like lime juice.

You are kind of close, but not close enough. Breaking is not a chemical reaction.

That said, I should elaborate. Foods which are capable of breaking (in this context):
  • can break due to cooking/heating them, but not for the reasons or the way in which you mention.
  • can break due to adding something acidic like lime/lemon juice, but not for the reasons or the way in which you mention.
  • can break when spooned into a test tube and then placed in a centrifuge (this last one obviously involves neither cooking nor chemicals).

Which brings me to my next post, the "extra special bonus hint of the day."
 
Last edited:
  • #260
Extra Special Bonus Hint of the Day

Breaking in this context is technically a physical reaction, not a chemical one*. That said, it's right on the border between physical and chemical, but decidedly leaning toward the physical.​

*(Chemicals and chemical reactions can indirectly cause breaking [in substances that are capable of breaking in the first place, of course]. But the breaking itself is technically a physical reaction. Breaking can also occur without any chemical reactions taking place at all.)

To get extra special bonus credit, name the type of substance to which these foods -- and their non-food counterparts -- belong.

To get normal credit, name at least two examples of this type of food (or non-food), or one really good one**. (Remember, you are looking for a type of food [or even a non-food type of substance] that can "break.")

**(Particularly if it's a really good, yummy, tasty one.)
 
Last edited:
  • #261
We need another hint!
 
  • #262
The only time I've ever herd this term used in a kitchen in line with clues is when making a Hollandaise sauce.

If too much heat is used the eggs will start to cook and separate (break) from the emulsified butter.

*edit*

I guess after thinking on it for a bit this could also happen in any type of sauce that uses an emulsification of a fat. So another sauce that comes to mind is an Alfaro sauce. and that is all I have for tonight because it is wayyyyy past my bed time, dam you internet. :)
 
  • #263
Argentum Vulpes wins the round, including the extra special bonus points for mentioning a derivative of the word "emulsion."

Have you ever wondered what soap does? Yes, of course it helps clean things, but why soap? Why not some other substance? If you want to clean something, why not just rub walrus poo all over the surface? What is it in particular about soap that makes it more effective? Answer: Soap is an emulsifier.

There's an old saying that some say, "oil and water don't mix." Or do they? Well they sort can mix quite well if they are in an emulsion.

When you add soap to oil, the soap forms microscopic bubbles which encapsulate the oil. The soap, forming microscopic shells around the microscopic droplets of oil, is "soluble," so to speak, in water. Thus all of that can get rinsed away, something that wouldn't have happened without the soap. But "soap" isn't the only game in town. You wouldn't want to eat soap of course, but there are alternatives.

Many emulsifiers are edible and tasty.

But before I go into specific examples, emulsions have something in common. Think of "suds" and "bubbles" that go with soap. The size of the "bubbles" can vary from sub-microscopic up to the obviously macroscopic. All emulsions have that this sort of thing in common: some sort of bubbly thing going on that requires an emulsifier of some sort.

Here are some food examples of emulsions:
  • Mayonnaise (this is my favorite emulsion. More on this later.)
  • Mayonnaise based things such as
    • Tartar sauce (yummy)
    • Ranch dressing (So good. Don't get me started.)
    • Thousand island dressing (Wonderful on a Ruben sandwich)
    • etc.
  • Hollandaise (also grand. Eggs Benedict anyone?)
  • Yellow mustard (Not the best emulsion example, but still awesome.)
  • Most salad dressings (most, but not all. If you shake your salad dressing and it immediately separates, it's probably not an emulsion. But if you shake your salad dressing, and it stays mixed for at least a little while, it just might be an emulsion. Creamy dressings like ranch, blue cheese, are emulsions.)
  • Milk (Yes, milk. Milk is a very stable emulsion [hard to break] of fats in water. But technically it is an emulsion.)
  • Cream (also stable. Easier to break than milk, but still comparatively stable.)
  • Whipped cream (cream is an emulsion already, so why not add a little bit of air into the emulsion too.)
  • Butter (also comparatively stable.)
  • Peanut butter (this is a bad example, but is technically an emulsion none-the-less).
  • And as I've discovered the hard way, imitation, pasteurized, processed cheese-food spread substitute.

When the components (oil and water, or fat and water, or whatever) of an emulsion separate, the emulsion is said to "break." That means it is no longer homogenous on the macroscopic scale any more. Chefs need to be careful not to "break" their emulsions by ensuring they use the right proportions, combining ingredients the right order and using the right process.

Peanut butter isn't that great of an example of an emulsion, since once it breaks (the oil separates from the rest) it is easy to rectify just by stirring it back up, making it right again. Other food emulsions are far less forgiving. Let's work our way toward mayonnaise.

There are several foods which act as emulsifiers. Egg yoke is a good example. Egg yolk contains lecithin which is an emulsifier.

That brings us to mayonnaise.

Mayonnaise is made of
  • Almost all vegetable oil: lots and lots of vegetable oil.
  • A little bit of egg yolk.
  • A little bit of water.
  • A smaller bit of acid such as vinegar or lemon juice, just to get the PH optimal.
  • Maybe some salt/seasoning for flavor, maybe.
  • That's about it.

Note that all (or most) of the above are liquid. If you were to take all the ingredients, even in their correct proportions, and throw them all in a blender at once, you would not end up with mayonnaise. Rather you would end up with a watery, oily, liquid mess.

Instead, it is necessary to pour the oil into the rest very slowly -- one drop at a time in the beginning -- while vigorously whisking.

Make you own homemade mayonnaise.

Once you have mayonnaise, you can use it to make other things such as tarter sauce or salad dressing. But when adding more ingredients to the mayonnaise, be sure to add them slowly while stirring, otherwise you can break it.

Besides soap, paint is a fine example of a non-food emulsion. When wet, the paint is water soluble making clean-up much easier. The only reason this is possible is because when "wet" the paint is much more than just wet. It's an emulsion. As part of the process of drying, the emulsion breaks leaving only the "real" paint that dries, is not water soluble, and is very difficult or impossible to clean up with only a wet sponge by that time.

Okay, Argentum Vulpes. You're up. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #264
Argentum Vulpes? Hello?
 
  • #265
Well, we seem to have temporarily lost Argentum Vulpes. (Hurry back!)

In the mean time, let's go with a new, simple, quick round. This is meant to be a relatively easy one. If you don't know it off the top of your head, it shouldn't take much more than a few minutes of research. As usual, the first person who identifies the jargon term, gets to pick a new term.

Jargon term of the day: what is a via?

In this context:
  • It is a noun.
  • It's usually a tangible object. I say "usually," since there does exist circumstances where a via can be intangible. But in practice this almost never happens, and is more the exception than the rule. So I'll say a via is usually a tangible object. That's my story and I'm sticking with it.
  • It is a technical term. It wouldn't have existed 100* [sic] years ago.
  • A via is a very common term in the art to which it relates.

*(Edit: I take that back. It wouldn't have existed more than 111 years ago.)

Again, this round isn't meant to be tough. I picked the word via since its definition (in context) didn't come up directly in the first page of google hits (as of the time of this post). But with a little digging, it shouldn't be hard to figure out.
 
Last edited:
  • #266
Nobody?

Hint of the Day

Vias involve insulators and conductors.​
 
  • #267
I think that you are referring to the "via", as in, the little electrical pathway that separates different layers of an integrated circuit?
 
  • #268
QuarkCharmer said:
I think that you are referring to the "via", as in, the little electrical pathway that separates different layers of an integrated circuit?

Bingo! (Well, it usually refers to a printed circuit board [PCB], but can apply to an integrated circuit too, so good enough.)

QuarkCharmer wins the round.

Via's are "holes" in an electronic printed circuit board, usually filled (at least partially) with a conductor (e.g. solder) to connect different layers of the board. Vias can be made to go only between certain layers of a multi-layer board (more expensive, more complicated), or they can go through the entire board (cheaper, less complicated, but take up more overall board space).

200px-PCB_Spectrum.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_%28electronics%29

Vias can also be within an integrated circuit (a.k.a computer "chip").

I mentioned that vias were "usually" tangible. When designing and laying out a circuit board, any through hole is still called a via, even if it is not electrically connected to anything. A "hole" is not tangible. But usually vias are at least partially filled with conducting material (solder) if not completely filled, which makes them tangible.

Okay QuarkCharmer, you're up.
 
  • #269
I've been ridiculously busy for the last several weeks, as it looks like QuarkCharmer is AFK, I'll try to start this back up.

The word is:

Pickle

Hint:

It has nothing to do with any of this
 
  • #270
Argentum Vulpes said:
I've been ridiculously busy for the last several weeks, as it looks like QuarkCharmer is AFK, I'll try to start this back up.

The word is:

Pickle

Hint:

It has nothing to do with any of this

Pickle as in "the tricky/complicated situation" ?

For instance, "You're in quite the pickle!" ?

/Yeah sorry about being AFK
 
  • #271
QuarkCharmer said:
Pickle as in "the tricky/complicated situation" ?

For instance, "You're in quite the pickle!" ?

/Yeah sorry about being AFK

Nope, and this fits into my next clue:

If you forget/lose your pickle you will be in quite a pickle.
 
  • #272
I admit it, my mind is totally messed up with this game.. I miss PF chess :/
 
  • #273
Is a pickle some sort of portable storage like a USB flash drive?
 
  • #274
nope, I'll give the next hint tomorrow.
 
  • #275
Hint for today.

There is a mini version of a pickle that can clip to your belt loop.
 
  • #276
Ok still got people stumped, the next hint is a twofer:

A pickle can be very simple to a fancy computer system, and it can operate one to many in the same box.
 
  • #277
Is a pickle a key fob?
 
  • #278
Not quite.

Although you might need a key fob to operate some more advanced pickles. The most common device that is run by a pickle, that I see, has a "CM" logo on the side, although in other applications "CM" is not often found.
 
  • #279
The woman in the video has a pickle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #280
A remote control?
 
  • #281
Yup you got it Edward.

A pickle is used to operate lifting motors, after power is run, but before the main console control is run.
 
  • #282
OK here is an old one in a way, although the jargon is still used in a certain area.

THRUST RING
 
  • #283
Those two words say a bit too much on Google. A third word between the two narrows it down.

Think Cold War.
 
  • #284
Next clue: underground
 
  • #285
There were long cylindrical objects under ground and and they were attached to something.
 
  • #286
ICBM? I'm guessing its the hardware that attaches the warhead to the rocket rather than astronauts.
 
  • #287
It is related to an underground ICBM. What would an underground ICBM be attached to at the bottom? Place that word between thrust and ring and Google will show you a picture of a thrust ***** ring.
 
  • #288
I suppose the thrust ring is the piece that attaches the motor or engine to the rest of the rocket and transfers the thrust forces. This piece would be rather boring unless there's thrust vectoring. For vectoring, this piece would need to sustain a large load along the axis of the rocket while allowing the motor to pivot, but not rotate.
 
  • #289
You are getting closer. The engines did have thrust vectoring via another assembly that could also be cold war jargon. They are still used on modern rockets to allow the vectoring of the engines.

Think bigger. What is the entire missile attached to? That three word part in all underground silo's was also suspended by large springs that could absorb the shock of a nearby nuclear blast.
 
  • #290
the Thrust ring is the mount that holds the rocket from the bottom and vibrationally isolates it. It must be a ring rather than a plate so that the exhaust gases can go through the middle.
 
  • #291
flatmaster said:
the Thrust ring is the mount that holds the rocket from the bottom and vibrationally isolates it. It must be a ring rather than a plate so that the exhaust gases can go through the middle.

Close enough, a typical thrust mount ring looked like the one in the pictures below. There are no engines on the missile in the pictures. Put your cursor on the picture and you can see it from all angles. The next page shows it from the top.

http://nonplused.org/panos/titan_missile/27/silo-07_03.html

The Minuteman missiles had a weird setup with the springs mounted to the bottom of the silo and a cable that ran up and over a pulley that was secured to the silo wall. The cable run down from the pulley and attached to the thrust mount ring.

It isn't all history yet we still have about 500 Minuteman III missiles in service.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Minuteman_III_in_silo_1989.jpg



You're up.
 
  • #292
"Snakebite"

It's not the drink

Hint: A snakebite is a particular failure mode for a certain piece of equipment.
 
  • #293
Hint: A snakebite failure always has two punctures (like a snake bite).
 
  • #294
That would be a flat tire usually on a bicycle that is typically caused by hitting something. The tire and tube are "pinched." This leaves a puncture on each side of the tube.
 
  • #295
Yep. One often gets snakebites from under-inflated tires that compress more easily. You're up Edward
 
  • #296
And here I was suspecting it had something to do with magnetic fields. <Oops>. Sunspots always occur in pairs because sunspots' source are magnetic fields. For every magnetic field going "into" a particular sunspot, there is another coming "out of" of another sunspot. (So to speak, that is. Magnetic fields going "into" or "out of" is just a convention of direction; it doesn't indicate that something is actually moving from one to the other. It's just an arbitrary convention). Gauss' Law for magnetism hints that they must always come in pairs.

But boy, I was wrong on this snakebite thing. Sunspots are very different than bicycle tire flats. :redface:
 
Last edited:
  • #297
Sorry for the delay. This should be an easy one.

Pacing
 
  • #298
Does pacing have to do with controlling the rate at which something happens?
 
  • #299
Or oscillation, such as "pacing to and fro"?
 
  • #300
flatmaster said:
Does pacing have to do with controlling the rate at which something happens?

No it doesn't Edit: make that controlling the rate very, very indirectly.
 
Back
Top