How to become an amateur physicist

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and opportunities for a software engineer with a background in physics to contribute to ongoing physics research without pursuing a full PhD. The focus includes potential pathways for engagement in astrophysics and condensed matter physics, as well as the balance between professional commitments and academic pursuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to re-engage with physics and contribute to research, despite not being able to commit to a full PhD due to time constraints.
  • Another participant highlights the difficulty of making meaningful contributions to research without the time commitment typically required for a PhD.
  • A later reply acknowledges the time limitations and suggests that consistent study could lead to a level of understanding comparable to a master's degree.
  • There is a suggestion to leverage software engineering skills in computational physics as a potential avenue for contribution, although the specifics of this approach are not detailed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of contributing to physics research without a PhD. While some acknowledge the potential for meaningful engagement with limited time, others emphasize the challenges inherent in such an endeavor.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the significant time commitment typically required for graduate studies, which may not align with the available hours of the original poster. There is also a lack of consensus on specific pathways or projects that could be pursued given the constraints mentioned.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals with a background in physics or related fields who are considering alternative pathways to engage in research without pursuing a full graduate program may find this discussion relevant.

SuspectTax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a recently graduated software engineer. During my time at university I had initially planned to double major in both physics and computer science but eventually dropped physics since I didn't expect that I would pursue a PhD for monetary reasons. I really enjoyed physics during my time at university though and before dropping I had completed Classical Dynamics, Statistical Mechanics, and reasonably self-studied up through QM2.

While my mathematical skills aren't quite as honed as they were, I'm reasonably comfortable with vector calculus, ODEs, calculus of variations, and some abstract algebra and topology. Now that I've settled into life outside of university into software engineering, I'd like to jump back into physics, but I'm not sure what the best way of making a useful or valuable contribution to the literature or infrastructure.

I believe that I have the discipline to continue my education into upper-undergraduate and graduate level physics/math topics, so long as I have some kind of purpose to keep developing it(I.e. a directed research project).

All in all, I'd like to get involved in research in the physics community and I'm willing to invest time and effort into doing so, but I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD. What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

If its of any use, my primary research interests as of now are split between astrophysics and astrophysical phenomenology, and condensed matter physics.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SuspectTax said:
I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD
SuspectTax said:
What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

This is going to be hard. That's essentially what a PhD is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and symbolipoint
Vanadium 50 said:
This is going to be hard. That's essentially what a PhD is.
Yeah, it’s less that I’m opposed to doing a PhD, and more that between my job, life, and a very committed hobby, a full PhD would be a big strain on everything else. As of now, I would say I’m capable of consistently committing somewhere between 6-10 hours per week on physics. I expect that later on in life I may be more free to commit to a full PhD, but until then I’d like to at least do something to build and maintain my skills in physics while also contributing to something valuable.
 
6-10 hours per week is 10% of what a grad student spends. It takes a grad student 6 years on average to finish a PhD. You do the math. :smile:
 
If you want to study physics for the fun of it and you are willing to put 6-10 hours weekly I'd say you could reach a level of a "master" degree with consistent work in a reasonable amount of time.

SuspectTax said:
All in all, I'd like to get involved in research in the physics community and I'm willing to invest time and effort into doing so, but I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD. What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

If its of any use, my primary research interests as of now are split between astrophysics and astrophysical phenomenology, and condensed matter physics.
Now, about this, I'd say your best bet is to try to use your knowledge as a software engineer and try to apply it to physics. It is far from my expertise so I can't say anything concrete, but try too look what is hot in computational physics and compare it with your current knowledge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
667
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K