Other How to become an amateur physicist

AI Thread Summary
A recently graduated software engineer with a background in physics seeks to re-engage with the field while balancing a full-time job and personal commitments. Although initially considering a PhD, the individual prefers to invest 6-10 hours per week into physics without the full commitment of a doctoral program. The primary research interests include astrophysics and condensed matter physics. Suggestions for meaningful contributions to ongoing research include leveraging software engineering skills in computational physics, which is a growing area in the field. The discussion emphasizes the importance of finding a directed research project to maintain motivation and skill development in physics.
SuspectTax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a recently graduated software engineer. During my time at university I had initially planned to double major in both physics and computer science but eventually dropped physics since I didn't expect that I would pursue a PhD for monetary reasons. I really enjoyed physics during my time at university though and before dropping I had completed Classical Dynamics, Statistical Mechanics, and reasonably self-studied up through QM2.

While my mathematical skills aren't quite as honed as they were, I'm reasonably comfortable with vector calculus, ODEs, calculus of variations, and some abstract algebra and topology. Now that I've settled into life outside of university into software engineering, I'd like to jump back into physics, but I'm not sure what the best way of making a useful or valuable contribution to the literature or infrastructure.

I believe that I have the discipline to continue my education into upper-undergraduate and graduate level physics/math topics, so long as I have some kind of purpose to keep developing it(I.e. a directed research project).

All in all, I'd like to get involved in research in the physics community and I'm willing to invest time and effort into doing so, but I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD. What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

If its of any use, my primary research interests as of now are split between astrophysics and astrophysical phenomenology, and condensed matter physics.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SuspectTax said:
I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD
SuspectTax said:
What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

This is going to be hard. That's essentially what a PhD is.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and symbolipoint
Vanadium 50 said:
This is going to be hard. That's essentially what a PhD is.
Yeah, it’s less that I’m opposed to doing a PhD, and more that between my job, life, and a very committed hobby, a full PhD would be a big strain on everything else. As of now, I would say I’m capable of consistently committing somewhere between 6-10 hours per week on physics. I expect that later on in life I may be more free to commit to a full PhD, but until then I’d like to at least do something to build and maintain my skills in physics while also contributing to something valuable.
 
6-10 hours per week is 10% of what a grad student spends. It takes a grad student 6 years on average to finish a PhD. You do the math. :smile:
 
If you want to study physics for the fun of it and you are willing to put 6-10 hours weekly I'd say you could reach a level of a "master" degree with consistent work in a reasonable amount of time.

SuspectTax said:
All in all, I'd like to get involved in research in the physics community and I'm willing to invest time and effort into doing so, but I don't have the time to commit to a full PhD. What are the best options for me to make a meaningful contribution to ongoing physics research?

If its of any use, my primary research interests as of now are split between astrophysics and astrophysical phenomenology, and condensed matter physics.
Now, about this, I'd say your best bet is to try to use your knowledge as a software engineer and try to apply it to physics. It is far from my expertise so I can't say anything concrete, but try too look what is hot in computational physics and compare it with your current knowledge.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
776
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top