How to break up kinetic energy for circular motion?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around breaking down kinetic energy in the context of circular motion, utilizing the Lagrangian mechanics framework. Participants are exploring the relationship between tangential velocity, radius, and angular velocity in a system influenced by a spring.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the total kinetic energy using the Lagrangian approach and are questioning the correctness of their calculations. There are discussions about the definitions of variables, the treatment of signs in equations, and the implications of changing radius on velocity components.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's approach, pointing out potential errors in sign conventions and dimensional consistency. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and relationships between variables, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the depth of their explorations. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in notation and definitions, particularly regarding the roles of angular velocity and radius in the kinetic energy calculations.

Nate Stevens
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem.png

Figure 1.png

Homework Equations


L = T-V
For constant frequency tangential velocity is (radius)*(w)

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to find r(t) using the Langrangian L = T-V

I just was not sure whether I am on the right track for calculating the total kinetic energy for the above system correctly.

Part I.png


Part II.png

Part III.png

Part IIII.png

Have I done okay so far?
 

Attachments

  • Problem.png
    Problem.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 885
  • Figure 1.png
    Figure 1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 979
  • Part I.png
    Part I.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 1,295
  • Part II.png
    Part II.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,026
  • Part III.png
    Part III.png
    15.1 KB · Views: 364
  • Part III.png
    Part III.png
    15.1 KB · Views: 1,056
  • Part IIII.png
    Part IIII.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 1,003
Physics news on Phys.org
##\dot r## should be positive when r is increasing. You seem to be using it the other way.
In calculating "vtan,+" you lost ω somewhere. As a result your final equation is dimensionally inconsistent.
 
haruspex said:
##\dot r## should be positive when r is increasing. You seem to be using it the other way.
In calculating "vtan,+" you lost ω somewhere. As a result your final equation is dimensionally inconsistent.

Didn't I account for r dot's negative sign when adding "vtan, +" and "vtan, -"? (you are right though that initially I didn't attach a negative sign, which is incorrect) And good catch on the ω. I just dropped it when plugging into (vtan, +)-(vtan, -).
 
Nate Stevens said:
Didn't I account for r dot's negative sign when adding "vtan, +" and "vtan, -"? (you are right though that initially I didn't attach a negative sign, which is incorrect) And good catch on the ω. I just dropped it when plugging into (vtan, +)-(vtan, -).
You had not defined that subscript notation. I was reading the first sentence of the second image: "the spring will pull the mass towards ..."
Also, that is not what you mean. It has nothing to do with the spring's pull. It is simply that changing r leads to a component of the particle's velocity in the tangential direction.

What I did not pick up is that you also have a sign problem with the other contributor. The way you have defined θ and ω in the diagram, ##\dot\theta=-\omega##.

Bottom line, increasing r contributes a leftward motion and positive (anticlockwise) ω does likewise, so your final equation should have +, not -.
 
Nate Stevens said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 235085
View attachment 235086

Homework Equations


L = T-V
For constant frequency tangential velocity is (radius)*(w)

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to find r(t) using the Langrangian L = T-V

I just was not sure whether I am on the right track for calculating the total kinetic energy for the above system correctly.

View attachment 235091

View attachment 235092
View attachment 235094
View attachment 235095
Have I done okay so far?

I like to do these things in the most straightforward way, avoiding too much "thinking" and fancy geometry. So, I would write the position vector for the center of the long rod as ##\vec{x}_c(t) = ( l \cos (\omega t), l \sin(\omega t))## ---- assuming that the center is at ##(l,0)## when ##t = 0.## The perpendicular direction along the long rod from its center is ##\vec{d} = (-\sin(\omega t), \cos(\omega t)),## so the position vector of the mass at time ##t## is
$$\vec{r}_m (t) = \vec{x}_c(t) + r(t) \vec{d} = (l \cos(\omega t) - r(t) \sin(\omega t), \ \sin(\omega t) + r(t) \cos(\omega t)) \hspace{3ex}(1)$$
You can find the velocity ##\vec{V}_m (t)## of the mass by differentiating wrt ##t## in equation (1). Then you can expand and simplify to obtaing a pretty nice expression for ##V_m^2, ##. The resulting total kinetic energy is quite simple. I did not bother to try to separate the kinetic energy into radial and tangential components, because I could not see any reason for doing so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K