How to calculate mass of fuel needed to escape Earth gravity vs. Mars gravity

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the fuel needed to escape Earth's and Mars' gravity involves using the Rocket Equation, which incorporates escape velocities and specific impulse. The discussion highlights an error in the assumption that more fuel is required for Mars than for Earth, which contradicts expected outcomes. It emphasizes that specific impulse should be consistent across calculations, regardless of planetary gravity, as the mass of the rocket remains constant. The principle of conservation of momentum is crucial, and the gravitational acceleration used in calculations must match the specific impulse's derivation. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between fuel requirements and escape velocities for both planets.
jhochstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine approximately how much fuel it would take to launch a bi-propellant rocket from Mars and Earth such that they escape each planet's respective gravity. Unfortunately, my orbital mechanics is a little rusty, and the solution I'm getting does not make much sense. Here's what I've been trying - hopefully someone can point out my error:

Assumptions:
Earth escape velocity (Vesc,e) = 11 200 m/s
Mars escape velocity (Vesc,m) = 5 027 m/s
Gravity of Earth (ge) = 9.81 m/s2
Gravity of Mars (gm) = 3.71 m/s2
Specific Impulse of a bipropellant liquid rocket (Isp) = 450 s
Dry mass of rocket (structure + payload) = Mdry
Mass of rocket fuel = Mfuel
Wet mass of rocket = Mwet

Okay, using the Rocket Equation we have

deltaV = Vexhaust * ln(Mwet/Mdry) = Vexhaust * ln((Mdry + Mfuel)/Mdry)

Therefore, deltaV/Vexhaust = ln(Mdry + Mfuel)/Mdry)

And, e(deltaV/Vexhaust) = e(ln(Mdry + Mfuel)/Mdry)) = (Mdry + Mfuel)/Mdry)

Mdry * e(deltaV/Vexhaust) - Mdry = Mfuel

Therefore, Mfuel = Mdry(e(deltaV/Vexhaust) - 1)

If Vexhaust = Isp * g then Mfuel = Mdry(e(deltaV/Isp*g) - 1)

Assuming that the deltav equals the escape velocity, the fuel required to escape Earth gravity is

Mfuel,earth = Mdry(e(11200/(450*9.81)) - 1) = 5.8965 * Mdry

and,

Mfuel,mars = Mdry(e(5027/(450*3.71)) - 1) = 7.1828 * Mdry

This would seem to say that more fuel is required to escape Mars than is needed to escape Earth, which seems completely incorrect. Can someone please point out to me where I've gone wrong?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Your specific impulse for both rockets was determined using Earth's gravity. Then you used your fuel rate using Earth's gravity for the Earth rocket and Mar's gravity for the Mars rocket.

The units for specific impulse (sec) and fuel rate (N/sec or lbs/sec) are totally artificial and are obtained by tossing 'g' into the equations for each. (Actually, it's just a unit conversion.)

In reality, rockets are based on the simple principle of conservation of momentum. The mass times velocity of the fuel tossed out the back equals the change in momentum of the rocket.

Mass doesn't change regardless of where you are. If you realize its the mass that really matters and that the 'g' tossed into each equation should cancel out, then you'll realize you need to use the same 'g' no matter which planet you're talking about.

It does seem a strange way of doing things. But specific impulse is more a measure of how efficient the fuel process is than anything else. In the end, you do get a force from your thrusters measured in the proper units for force (Newtons or pounds).

And I realize you didn't calculate the specific impulse - that it was given to you, but I guarantee 'g' was used in coming up with the specific impulse and the 'g' was 9.8 m/sec^2. (Which is why "If Vexhaust = Isp * g..." is true; you're pulling the 'g' back out of your specific impulse. You need to make sure you're pulling out the same 'g' that originally went in.) And, in reality, that specific impulse will be constantly changing, so be glad they just gave it to you, even if it leads to some confusion (as the pressure in the fuel tanks decrease, the specific impulse will decrease while, conversely, as the temperature builds up due to the chemical reactions, the specific impulse will increase - think PV=NRT).

The working versions of equations for things are always the easiest for doing calculations, but tend to use some shortcuts that obscure what's really happening, so I can see why you would make the assumptions you did.

Specific impulse is the velocity of the fuel coming out of the thruster divided by g. Fuel rate is the mass of the fuel being used per second times g. The g just cancels out, leaving mv. Of course, the rate you're using up fuel also determines the rate that the rocket is losing mass, which affects the acceleration from your thrusters, hence some of the other parameters in your equations. A lot of things are being rolled into just a few equations.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, BobG. I appreciate the clarification.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top