How to Calculate Minimum Thickness for No Reflection in a Thin Film?

  • Thread starter Thread starter akmphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Film Thin film
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thin film problem involving light reflection and refraction at the boundaries of air, a thin film, and water. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum thickness of the film that results in no reflection, given specific indices of refraction and wavelengths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of destructive interference and its relation to the thickness of the film. They question how to calculate the minimum thickness and the implications of wavelength changes in different media. Some participants discuss the phase changes upon reflection and the conditions for achieving minimum reflectance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationships between wavelength, frequency, and refractive indices. There is a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the calculations and concepts, with some participants offering clarifications and others seeking further explanation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of light behavior at interfaces, including assumptions about phase changes and the nature of reflection and refraction. There is an emphasis on the need for clarity in the definitions and relationships between the various parameters involved in the problem.

akmphy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
HELP with thin film problem!

Homework Statement



Consider a horizontal plane of thin film with
a thickness t. This film is located in between
air and water (see sketch). Light is directed
from the air downward through the film and
into the water, perpendicular to the surfaces.The index of refraction of the film n1 = 1.5.
The index of refraction of water is n2 = 1.33.
The wavelength of the incident wave in the air
is lambda air, and its frequency in air is f =
c/
.The wavelength lambda water of the light in the
water is:
and The smallest non-zero thickness t(min) leading
to no reflection is:

Homework Equations



t= m(lambda film)/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the net phase change equals one half of the wavelength because it undergoes a phase change from air to film, and experiences no phase change from film to water. I do not understand how to start this problem. I thought that the wave would reflect off the surface of the water, thus experiencing no wavelength in the water. Any help would be appreciated. No, I have no idea how to attach the image. It is three parallel surfaces, with n1 being the film, and n2 being the water
 
Physics news on Phys.org


akmphy said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I do not understand how to start this problem. I thought that the wave would reflect off the surface of the water, thus experiencing no wavelength in the water.


Only a little part of light reflects from water, the wast of it enters into the water, that is why you can see pebbles, fish and so on... Do you think it is total darkness below the surface of water?

ehild
 


Logically, of course light enters the water. But, the diagrams insinuate that the ray is reflected off the surface of the water when going from gasoline's index of refraction, to water's index of refraction. For the problem set up..
a.)how would I even begin to calculate the smallest non zero thickness leading to no reflection?

t= m(lambda film)/2 which is destructive interference

b.)For algebraic representation of the wavelength of water, would it look like:

lamda water = n1/n2(lambda) ; this is one of the choices.

c.)Will the frequency of the light in the water decrease because the wavelength experiences destructive interference?

Thanks for any help.
 


So far I understand that the frequency stays the same in the water, and that tmin= (lambda air)/2(n of film)
I still need help on the wavelength in the water in relation to the wavelength in the air:

(lambda air/ n of film)= lambda of film
lambda film/2 = lambda of water = [(lambda air/n of film)/2]/ n of water = lambda of water
This is not one of my choices.
 


The frequency (f) of the light is its inherent property, it does not change upon refraction.
Both the speed of propagation and the wavelength are different in different media.
The speed of light is v = c/n in a medium of refractive index n. The wavelength is λ=v/f, λ0=c/f in vacuum. λ=λ0/n.

The wave reflected from the air-film surface (red ray) interferes with the wave reflected from the film-water interface (blue ray). The interference is destructive if the phase difference of these waves is odd multiple of pi. The phase changes by pi upon reflection if the light enters into a higher index material from a lower index one.(So the phase of the blue ray differs by pi from the incident one.) In the opposite case, the phase does not change.
The phase of the wave changes by (2pi/λ)*x traversing a distance x in a medium. The blue ray in the picture traverses the thickness of the film twice. So its phase change is 2t*(2pi/λ). The phase difference between the blue and red rays is 4pi/λ-pi and it should be equal to pi(2m-1). (m is 1, 2 3 ...)

(4pi/ λ)t-pi=(2m-1)pi → (4pi/ λ)t=(2m)pi → 2t/λ=m*pi → t=mλ/2.

m=1 for the thinnest layer producing destructive interference, and

t=λ/2=λ0/(2nfilm).

You get minimum reflectance with that film, but not zero reflectance. Zero reflectance is obtained if the refractive index of the film is the geometric mean of those of the surrounding media. nfilm=√(nairnsubstrate)

ehild
 

Attachments

  • oilonwater.JPG
    oilonwater.JPG
    4.7 KB · Views: 608


Ehild,
I think I understand most of what you are saying.
As far as the wavelength of lambda water, are you saying that it is:

lambda water= Lambda air/ n of the water

That makes sense.
 


akmphy said:
lambda water= Lambda air/ n of the water

That makes sense.

Yes, it is right.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K