How to Calculate Mu* for Superconducting Systems Using McMillan Formula?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter angel 42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconducting System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Coulomb pseudo-potential mu* for superconducting systems using the McMillan formula. Participants explore the relationship between mu* and other parameters, particularly in the context of determining the critical temperature Tc for superconductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • A participant seeks assistance in calculating mu* using the McMillan formula, expressing uncertainty about the validity of their approach and the need for a relationship between mu* and the density of states (DOS).
  • Another participant suggests consulting "Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy" by E L Wolf for additional insights.
  • A later reply indicates that Wolf's text may not provide the necessary details and recommends referring to the original McMillan paper for a more thorough understanding, specifically pointing to Eq. 13 and its derivation by Morel and Anderson.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to calculate mu*, and multiple viewpoints regarding the sources and equations to use remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the complexities involved in calculating mu* and the relevance of various references. There is mention of additional unknown quantities, such as volume, that complicate the calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those studying superconductivity, particularly in relation to the McMillan formula and the calculation of the Coulomb pseudo-potential in superconducting systems.

angel 42
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, Do you know any equation can help me to calculate the Coulomb pseudo-potential mu*, cause I'm working on McMillan formula
Tc= thetaD/1.45 {-1.04(1+lamda)/[ lamda – mu*(1+ 0.62 lamda)]}

trying to find the critical temperature Tc for a superconducting system I only have three given quantities:
thetaD= 750 K (debye temp)
Lamda= 1.04 (the electron-phonon coupling constant)
N(Ef)= 18.26 state/atom.eV (density of states DOS)
I'm not still sure of this If it's correct or not cause I found many other formulas with different details. offcourse I get this formula from the net, I first choose mu*= 0.1 as most solutions but the prophesier said it's wrong to choose it arbitrarily I have to calculate mu* using the density of state. so I searched the net to find an equation that relates mu* to DOS I found one, but it was very complicated with another unknown quantities like the volume (volume of what, how can I find it from the given numbers and as far as I know the volume of the lattice- assume- couldn't be calculated from them:confused:) It's like self learning of something completely new and never taught before -mybe that's why I couldn't find a way to figure that out. I tried for a week before typing this. I really need to do this please help If anyone can, I appreciate all the help I'll have.

Desperate physicist
:frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to check out "Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy " by E L Wolf
 
I'm sorry it took a while to respond to this. Most of my text (and my journal access) are either at work, or from work, so most of the stuff I needed to refer to to answer this weren't available to me till today (since I am now at work).

The reference to Wolf's tunneling text isn't as useful because he simply stated it (pg. 523) and then gave you a reference to McMillan's paper (unless I missed it elsewhere in the text).

What you need is the original McMillan's paper (Phy. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)). Look at Eq. 13 of that paper, which was derived in another paper by Morel and Anderson (reference given therein). This is where you need to use the info that you have on the DOS.

Zz.
 
I'll see thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K