How to calculate the foraging radius of a bird?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on verifying the calculation of the foraging radius of a bird using a specific equation from a scientific paper. The equation is given as QC + Qλσ - T(Ema + Emc/2) divided by 2k + 2Qd/V, with specific values provided for each variable. The expected result is 205 km, but participants express confusion over the equation's structure and potential unit discrepancies. Ultimately, one user calculates a different result of 1693, indicating possible errors in the formula or arithmetic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ecological modeling and foraging theory
  • Familiarity with LaTeX for rendering mathematical equations
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions in physics
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation and problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the equation for calculating foraging radius in ecological studies
  • Learn about unit consistency in scientific calculations
  • Explore LaTeX for creating and rendering complex equations
  • Investigate common errors in ecological modeling and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Ecologists, wildlife biologists, researchers in animal behavior, and students studying ecological modeling will benefit from this discussion.

Manassa Mauler
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would love someone to verify the answer for equation 8 in this paper (bottom of page 263) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00368.x/epdf

For the sake of clarity here is the equation is LaTeX which you can render at the following link
\frac{QC + Q\lambda \sigma - T(_{Ema + \frac{_{Emc}}{2}}))}{2k + \frac{2Qd}{V}}
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

The inputs are:
Q = 5.2 * 10^6 Joules
C =1.5 kg
lambda = 0.055 kg per hour
sigma = 12 hours
T = 48 hours
Ema = 42 Watts
Emc =24 Watts
k=2 Joules per meter
V =45 km per hour
The answer should be 205 km

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
\frac{QC + Q\lambda \sigma - T(_{Ema + \frac{_{Emc}}{2}}))}{2k + \frac{2Qd}{V}}
 
Well. it seems to me the parentheses are unbalanced in the numerator, is one "open" parenthesis missing somewhere? Or can we assume it is okay to drop the very last one?
 
I apologise but I was incorrect when I looked at it again. Here is the correct version
Q <- 5.2 * 10^6 Joules
C <- 1.5 kg
d <- 0.055 kg per hour
t <- 12 hours
Time <- 48 hours
Ema <- 24 Watts
Emc <- 42 Watts
k <- 2 joules per meter
V <- 45 km per hour
Thanks for looking at this Jim
CodeCogsEqn.png
 
Show your work, please. I get 1693. But what you posted may not be what you and I solved.
My calculation seems ridiculous to me. So I am guessing the formula has a problem - or I can't do arithmetic. Either is possible. Plus, I think there may be a problem with units.

PS: the paper you linked is behind a paywall for me. So I cannot verify anything including my work.
 
Last edited:
As child, before I got my first X-ray, I used to fantasize that I might have a mirror image anatomy - my heart on the right, my appendix on the right. Why not? (Caveat: I'm not talking about sci-fi molecular-level mirroring. We're not talking starvation because I couldn't process certain proteins, etc.) I'm simpy tlakng about, when a normal zygote divides, it technically has two options which way to form. Oen would expcet a 50:50 split. But we all have our heart on the left and our...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K