MHB How to Calculate Total Toothpicks and Squares in Any Figure of the Sequence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marsman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Squares
marsman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please help! I need to be able to find the number of total toothpicks used in any given figure in this sequence, in addition to total squares in any figure, using the figure number.View attachment 1592
The only way I can figure this out is by listing them all out one by one, which is TERRIBLE :(
Thank you so much in advance!
 

Attachments

  • fig number stacked.png
    fig number stacked.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 134
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marsman said:
Please help! I need to be able to find the number of total toothpicks used in any given figure in this sequence, in addition to total squares in any figure, using the figure number.View attachment 1592
The only way I can figure this out is by listing them all out one by one, which is TERRIBLE :(
Thank you so much in advance!
Suggestion: In the six figures, count how many toothpicks you have to add to each figure in order to get the next one. Can you see a pattern there?
 
Opalg said:
Suggestion: In the six figures, count how many toothpicks you have to add to each figure in order to get the next one. Can you see a pattern there?

Yeah I'm up to my neck in patterns; I made a table and everything.
[table="width: 500, class: grid"]
[tr][td]Figure Number[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td]Number of Toothpicks[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]18[/td]
[td]28[/td]
[td]40[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td]Increase in Toothpicks[/td]
[td]+4[/td]
[td]+6[/td]
[td]+8[/td]
[td]+10[/td]
[td]+12[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td]Number of Squares[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]15[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td]Increase in Squares[/td]
[td]+1[/td]
[td]+2[/td]
[td]+3[/td]
[td]+4[/td]
[td]+5[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
My problem is that I can't get from the patterns to creating a formula that would work for any figure number without listing them all out consecutively
 
I see you have found that the difference in the number of toothpicks per iteration (where you state the increase in toothpicks) are the sequence of even numbers, beginning with 4. What is the second difference, that is, the difference of the differences. How much does the increase increase each time?
 
marsman said:
Yeah I'm up to my neck in patterns; I made a table and everything.
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]Figure Number[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Number of Toothpicks[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[TD]40[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Increase in Toothpicks[/TD]
[TD]+4[/TD]
[TD]+6[/TD]
[TD]+8[/TD]
[TD]+10[/TD]
[TD]+12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Number of Squares[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Increase in Squares[/TD]
[TD]+1[/TD]
[TD]+2[/TD]
[TD]+3[/TD]
[TD]+4[/TD]
[TD]+5[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
My problem is that I can't get from the patterns to creating a formula that would work for any figure number without listing them all out consecutively
Let $x_n$ be the number of toothpicks in Fig. $n$. Your table shows that $x_1=4$, $x_2=4+6$, $x_3=4+6+8$, $x_4=4+6+8+10$, $\ldots$. So what is the formula for $x_n$?

[sp]Hints: arithmetic progression, $n$ terms, first term $4$, common difference $2$.[/sp]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top