How to Calculate Work Done from an Acceleration vs. Time Graph?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating work done from an acceleration vs. time graph for a particle with a mass of 2 kg. The original poster is attempting to derive the work done over a specified distance using the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of calculating work by finding the area under the force vs. displacement graph. There is an exploration of the relationship between acceleration, force, and displacement, with some participants questioning the interpretation of the graph's scale.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on interpreting the graph and calculating the area under the curve. The original poster has acknowledged a misunderstanding regarding the graph's scale, which has influenced their calculations. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of sufficient information for an integral solution and has identified a misreading of the graph's scale, which has impacted their approach to calculating work done.

CAllensworth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given Data: Graph, 2 kg particle.I am asked to calculate the work done from 0 to 4 meters, or some other interval. Normally I would simply multiply the FORCE of the given particle by multiplying 6m/s^2 times 2kg to create a new force vs. displacement graph, and then calculate the area under the linear piecewise curve. I am doing something wrong

Homework Equations


[/B]
acceleration_vs_time_work_by_falchiongpx-d82wk1e.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculate the forces as 2kg*acceleration to get the variable force y-values. Calculate area under curve... does not work according to book. Do not seem have enough info for an integral solution.

Sample attempt for Work (J) done from 1 to 2 meters..

1/2(1m*(2kg*18 m/s^2))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to have an acceleration vs displacement graph (bottom horizontal axis).
Work is the area under the force vs displacement graph.
From 1-2m the area is a triangle ... which you did.
What is the problem?
 
In the first meter, judging from the picture, the triangle under the line has an area of (1 m*18 m/s2)/2 = 9 m2/s2

Now you multiply that by the 2kg of mass, and get 18 Joule. The units are right: acceleration [LT-2] by displacement [L] by mass [M], hence ML2T-2.

That way, you can continue the integration 'by eye'...
 
I found out that I misreading the graph from the book. The book labels the scale as = 6m/s2. Every horizontal line represented was actually 2m/s2, with the graph maxing out at 6m/s2. Unfortunately, as was actually the MAX value for the graph. My problem was with reading the scale incorrectly. The teacher was kind enough to go over the problem with me where I realized that each increment of the y-value was 2 m/s2, instead of 6 m/s2.

Note: apologies if I mislabeled the last graph. Please let me know if this is wrong.

Corrected Graph Accel vs Displacement Graph, this is a better representation of what was in the book:

While as = 6m/s

acceleration_vs_disp_work_corrected_by_falchiongpx-d82x92j.jpg

Solution:
a) Read the graph carefully, and locate all notations, even if you require a microscope.
b) Convert y-values on the graph from acceleration to FORCE via F=ma:
6m/s2(2 kg)=12 Newtons, hold the figs

i. Re-graph as a graph of F (x), and calculate the area under the curve for the W.
f_x__vs_disp_for_work_by_falchiongpx-d82x9f4.jpg


ii. For finding the velocity at x meters, take the integral of F(x)...

Antiderivative of F(x) results in 1/2mv2
InteGRAL over a an interVAL.
(I'm new to integration)

W=W=1/2mv2 - 1/2mv20

Which is coincidental:
ΔKE=KE-KE0

And where initial velocity is zero.

v=√[(2*J)/(m)] → v=√[(2*J)/(2 kg)]
Does the particle change direction? Answer: what has the greatest energy? The energy for a slowdown or the energy for a speedup?

This allows for solving Work Done, and Velocity from a(x). Acceleration as it relates to Displacement.​
 
Last edited:
ii. For finding the velocity at x meters, take the integral of F(x)...
... or use the work-energy theorem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K