MHB How to Choose the Right Running Shoes for You

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joelly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Running
Joelly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Screenshot_20201126-080309~2.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you taking an "Abstract Algebra". If so you should know what "isomorphic" means- that there is a function from one group to the other, f: G->H, that
1) it is "one-to-one"- if f(x)= f(y) the x= y.
2) it is "onto"- for every y in H there exist x in G such that f(x)= y.
3) it "preserves the operation"- f(x+ y)= f(x)+f(y).

G is defined as multiples of 2 and H is defined as multiples of 3. What about f(2n)= 3n?
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Similar threads

MathHelpBoards.com merges with PF
Replies
42
Views
5K
What Is the Probability of Finding 10 Consecutive Shoes with 5 Left and 5 Right?
Replies
19
Views
2K
B Is it possible to calculate how much force is exerted on the ground and shoe midsole by your body while you run?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Trying To Run A Python File [Solved]
Replies
2
Views
761
Help to run input file (MCNPX)
Replies
4
Views
618
How can it damage an air-conditioner to run it when it is cold outside?
Replies
44
Views
4K
Introducing Math Problem of the Week
Replies
44
Views
5K
Troubleshooting CMD: Issue with Running .exe Files Using PATH
Replies
19
Views
4K
B Is It Better to Run or Walk in the Rain?
Replies
46
Views
6K
Trying to install software on a new PC to run Python code I wrote in 2021
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top