How to create a mathematical model of investment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Model
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around creating a mathematical model for investment, specifically focusing on a scenario where an individual with no initial capital invests continuously at a constant rate with a compounded annual return. Participants are exploring the implications of the differential equation that models this investment scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the differential equation that models the investment scenario, questioning the continuity of the equation at time zero and the implications of dividing by time. Some are exploring the relationship between the rate of return and the continuous investment, while others are trying to clarify the assumptions regarding the investment rate.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the modeling of the investment. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of continuous compounding and the formulation of the differential equation, while others express uncertainty about the continuity of the model at the initial time. Guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the investment rate and its implications for the model.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the constraints of the problem, particularly the assumption of a constant investment rate versus a variable one, and the potential issues arising from the mathematical formulation at time zero.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91

Homework Statement


"Someone with no initial capital ##S_0=0## invests ##k \frac{dollar}{year}## at an annual rate of return ##r##. Assume that investments are made continuously and that the return is compounded continuously."

Find the solution ##S## that solves the differential equation modeling this scenario.

Homework Equations


Let ##S## be the amount of capital at any time.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to make sure that the units of all my quantities are the same, but the main problem I'm having is the discontinuity at ##t=0## when I divide ##S## by ##t##.

##\frac{dS}{dt}=\frac{S}{t}+k(r+1)##
##\frac{dS}{dt}-\frac{S}{t}=k(r+1)##
##\frac{d}{dt}(t^{-1}S)=\frac{k(r+1)}{t}##
##S(t)=(tlnt)(k(r+1))##

I frankly do not know how to model this problem. Can anyone help me understand what is happening in this problem? It's hard to insert ##S## into the equation because the ##\frac{dS}{dt}## does not rely on ##S##; it relies on the rate of return ##r## which only applies to the yearly investments ##k##. Then it's compounded continually...? I do not understand this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eclair_de_XII said:

Homework Statement


"Someone with no initial capital ##S_0=0## invests ##k \frac{dollar}{year}## at an annual rate of return ##r##. Assume that investments are made continuously and that the return is compounded continuously."

Find the solution ##S## that solves the differential equation modeling this scenario.

Homework Equations


Let ##S## be the amount of capital at any time.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to make sure that the units of all my quantities are the same, but the main problem I'm having is the discontinuity at ##t=0## when I divide ##S## by ##t##.

##\frac{dS}{dt}=\frac{S}{t}+k(r+1)##
##\frac{dS}{dt}-\frac{S}{t}=k(r+1)##
##\frac{d}{dt}(t^{-1}S)=\frac{k(r+1)}{t}##
##S(t)=(tlnt)(k(r+1))##

I frankly do not know how to model this problem. Can anyone help me understand what is happening in this problem? It's hard to insert ##S## into the equation because the ##\frac{dS}{dt}## does not rely on ##S##; it relies on the rate of return ##r## which only applies to the yearly investments ##k##. Then it's compounded continually...? I do not understand this.

For a very small time increment of ##\Delta t## years, the amount invested between times ##t## and ##t + \Delta t## is ##k \Delta t ## dollars; that is what is meant by a continuous investment at rate ##k##.

If S(t) is the amount in the bank at time ##t## (years) we have
$$S(t+\Delta t) = S(t) (1 + r \Delta t) + k \Delta t \hspace{2cm}(1)$$
because the balance ##\$S(t)## at ##t## would grow by the interest-rate factor factor ##1 + r \Delta t## in the short time interval of length ##\Delta t##, even if we did not invest any more---but additional investment makes it grow more. That is what continuous compounding means: a dollar in the account at time zero grows to ##\$e^{rt}## by time ##t > 0##, and so the growth in value from ##t## to ##t + \Delta t## is
$$e^{r(t +\Delta t)} - e^{rt} = e^{rt} \left( e^{r \Delta t}-1 \right) \doteq e^{rt} (1 + \Delta t),$$
which is a growth rate of ##1 + r \Delta t.##

We get the differential equation for ##S(t)## from eq.(1) above.

For more on continuous compounding, see, eg.,
http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~waterman/Teaching/IntroMath99/Class04/Notes/node11.htm
http://people.duke.edu/~charvey/Classes/ba350_1997/preassignment/proof1.htm
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/539115/proof-of-continuous-compounding-formula
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Should I worry about the equation being continuous at ##t=0##? Yes, right? So I can't have any of the variables be divided by ##t## for the ##\frac{dollar}{year}## unit.
 
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my current model?

##\frac{dS}{dt}=r(S+kt)=rS+rkt##
##\frac{dS}{dt}-rS=rkt##
##\frac{d}{dt}(Se^{-rt})=(rkt)(e^{-rt})##

Basically, I get an equation with an extra linear term: ##S(t)=-kt+\frac{k}{r}(e^{rt}-1)##. It's another equation that satisfies the IVP at ##S(0)=0##. I'm not sure what to make of that, but at least I got something done tonight.
 
Last edited:
Eclair_de_XII said:
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my current model?

##\frac{dS}{dt}=r(S+kt)=rS+rkt##
##\frac{dS}{dt}-rS=rkt##
##\frac{d}{dt}(Se^{-rt})=(rkt)(e^{-rt})##

Basically, I get an equation with an extra linear term: ##S(t)=-kt+\frac{k}{r}(e^{rt}-1)##. It's another equation that satisfies the IVP at ##S(0)=0##. I'm not sure what to make of that, but at least I got something done tonight.

*************************************

The model above assumes that the person invests at rate ##kt## at time t, so is a variable investment rate that increases over time. The problem told you the investment rate is constant, not variable.

************************************

Eclair_de_XII said:
Thanks. Should I worry about the equation being continuous at ##t=0##? Yes, right? So I can't have any of the variables be divided by ##t## for the ##\frac{dollar}{year}## unit.

I have no idea what you are talking about. There is no issue of discontinuity anywhere, even at ##t = 0##. You do not divide by ##t##---that is not what rates are about. I explained exactly what was meant by rates, so all you need to do is re-read the post.
 
Last edited:
Oh, I got it: ##\frac{dS}{dt}=r(S+\frac{k}{r})##.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K