How to deal with gama5 in dimensional regularization?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter weifengchiu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regularization
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
weifengchiu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Note that the anti_symmetric tensor εμνρλis only defined in four-dimension space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quoting http://www.phys.vt.edu/~ersharpe/6455/janhand1.pdf:

Furthermore, we need to generalize γ5 to d dimensions. Doing so requires a certain amount of care. In particular, we previously defined γ5 = iγ0γ1γ2γ3, but in d dimensions this is no longer the product of all the gamma matrices. One way to try to proceed would be to define γ5 to be a matrix with the property that {γ5, γμ} = 0 for all μ in all dimensions d, but this leads to a contradiction. Instead, we will proceed as follows. We define γ5 = iγ0γ1γ2γ3 which formally looks the same as our previous definition in four dimensions, but which now has the consequence that although γ5 anticommutes with γμ for μ = 0, 1, 2, 3, it commutes with γμ for other values of μ.