How to deal with gama5 in dimensional regularization?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter weifengchiu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regularization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the treatment of the gamma matrix γ5 in the context of dimensional regularization, particularly when transitioning from four-dimensional to d-dimensional space. It emphasizes that the anti-symmetric tensor εμνρλ is only defined in four dimensions and that the conventional definition of γ5 as iγ0γ1γ2γ3 does not hold in higher dimensions. The proposed solution is to maintain the four-dimensional form of γ5 while acknowledging its differing commutation properties with γμ across dimensions, specifically that it anticommutes with γμ for μ = 0, 1, 2, 3, but commutes for other values of μ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma matrices in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with dimensional regularization techniques
  • Knowledge of anti-symmetric tensors in physics
  • Basic concepts of commutation and anticommutation relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of gamma matrices in various dimensions
  • Study the implications of dimensional regularization on quantum field theories
  • Explore the role of anti-symmetric tensors in theoretical physics
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students studying dimensional regularization and the properties of gamma matrices.

weifengchiu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Note that the anti_symmetric tensor εμνρλis only defined in four-dimension space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quoting http://www.phys.vt.edu/~ersharpe/6455/janhand1.pdf:

Furthermore, we need to generalize γ5 to d dimensions. Doing so requires a certain amount of care. In particular, we previously defined γ5 = iγ0γ1γ2γ3, but in d dimensions this is no longer the product of all the gamma matrices. One way to try to proceed would be to define γ5 to be a matrix with the property that {γ5, γμ} = 0 for all μ in all dimensions d, but this leads to a contradiction. Instead, we will proceed as follows. We define γ5 = iγ0γ1γ2γ3 which formally looks the same as our previous definition in four dimensions, but which now has the consequence that although γ5 anticommutes with γμ for μ = 0, 1, 2, 3, it commutes with γμ for other values of μ.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K