How to determin the equation of quadratic function?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the equation of a quadratic function given specific points, including the vertex and another point on the curve. Participants explore different methods for deriving the quadratic equation, including vertex form and standard form, and discuss potential errors in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to find the equation of a quadratic function given the vertex (-2,3) and a point (2,5), expressing difficulty in recalling the method.
  • Another participant suggests using the vertex form of the quadratic equation, leading to the equation y=a(x+2)²+3 and solving for a.
  • A different approach is presented where a participant uses f(x) = a(x+2) + 3, leading to a different value for a, which raises questions about correctness.
  • Participants discuss verifying the derived equations by checking if they satisfy the given points and the vertex condition.
  • One participant expresses confusion over their calculations and seeks clarification on a new problem involving a vertex at x=2, a=-1, and a point (3,4), proposing an equation that is later challenged by others.
  • Another participant corrects the misunderstanding regarding the vertex's x-coordinate and provides a method to derive the quadratic equation based on the given conditions.
  • There is a mention of graphing a family of functions with the same x-coordinate, prompting further exploration of the concept of families of functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the various methods and calculations presented. Multiple approaches and interpretations are discussed, leading to some confusion and corrections without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions made by participants are not fully resolved, particularly regarding the values of coefficients and the forms of the equations. There are also indications of potential typographical errors in the expressions used.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about quadratic functions, particularly those struggling with deriving equations from given points and understanding vertex form versus standard form.

cruisx
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi guys what's up. I just have a small question i wish to ask. If you are given vertex(-2,3) and it passes through point(2,5) how do you determine its equation? Its been around 6 months since i last did some math so i am having a hard time remembering. I am not asking you guys to solve it but just to show me how to tackle it =). thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I presume you are asking for a curve of the form y=ax2+bx+c.
The vertex at (-2,3) gives you an equation y=a(x+2)2+3.
Plug in the point value gives you 5=16a+3 or a=1/8.
 
hi, thanks for the reply but when a friend helped me out this is how we did it.

we used f(x) = a(x+2) + 3

then we sub'ed in our point (2,5) to get

5 = a(2+2)^2 + 3
5 = a(4)^2 + 3
5 = 16a + 3
2 = 16a
a = 8

after that we just put a back into the equation to get

f(x) = 8(x+2)^2 + 3

is this correct?

Also another question i wanted to ask is how would i get the quadratic equation if you are given an X coordinate of the vertex in 2, a = -1 and passes through point (3,4)? This is what i am thinking but i don't know if this is correct.

f(x) = -1(x -2 )2 + 0
4 = -1(3-2)2 + 0

and then i would go on from there?
 
Last edited:
cruisx said:
hi, thanks for the reply but when a friend helped me out with it i got

(1/8)x^2 + (1/2)x + (7/2) = y

is this correct?

Yes.

[tex](1/8)x^2 + (1/2)x + 7/2 = 1/8 (x+2)^2+3[/tex]
so it's the same answer mathman gave you.

You can check it in several ways (this is always a good exercise if you aren't completely sure of your answer). We need to check that (-2,3) and (2,5) satisfy your equation so we insert x=-2 and x=2 to check the values of y:
[tex]1/8*(-2)^2 + 1/2 * (-2) + 7/2 = 3[/tex]
[tex]1/8*(2)^2 + 1/2 * 2 + 7/2 = 5[/tex]
Thus you graph passes through both points. You also need to verify that it has a minimum or maximum at x = -2. This can be checked in a number of ways. In general for an equation of form:
[tex]ax^2 + bx + c = y[/tex]
the minimum or maximum is at x = -2a/b. If you don't know this formula, but know a little calculus you can determine local maximum and minimum points by differentiating and setting the derivative equal to 0. This gives us:
[tex]1/4x + 1/2 = 0[/tex]
in your case which has the solution x = -2. Since we know that a parabola has exactly one minimum or maximum point and it's differentiable at all points we know that this is it so the vertex is at x = -2. Otherwise you could try to complete the square to get:
[tex]y = 1/8(x+2)^2 + 3[/tex]
which shows us that [tex]y\geq 3[/tex] because the square of a real number is non-negative. Hence the vertex is at y= 3 which verifies our answer of (-2,3) for the vertex.

EDIT: Apparently you edited your post while I replied and changed the correct answer to an incorrect answer. In the first formula you omitted ^2, but I expect this is a typo as you remember it in later formulas. After 2 = 16a you should get 1 = 8a which gives a= 1/8 as mathman pointed out, but you somehow got a=8 which is incorrect (16*8 is not 2). Apart from that you should read mathman's reply as his solution is exactly the same.
 
rasmhop said:
Yes.

[tex](1/8)x^2 + (1/2)x + 7/2 = 1/8 (x+2)^2+3[/tex]
so it's the same answer mathman gave you.

You can check it in several ways (this is always a good exercise if you aren't completely sure of your answer). We need to check that (-2,3) and (2,5) satisfy your equation so we insert x=-2 and x=2 to check the values of y:
[tex]1/8*(-2)^2 + 1/2 * (-2) + 7/2 = 3[/tex]
[tex]1/8*(2)^2 + 1/2 * 2 + 7/2 = 5[/tex]
Thus you graph passes through both points. You also need to verify that it has a minimum or maximum at x = -2. This can be checked in a number of ways. In general for an equation of form:
[tex]ax^2 + bx + c = y[/tex]
the minimum or maximum is at x = -2a/b. If you don't know this formula, but know a little calculus you can determine local maximum and minimum points by differentiating and setting the derivative equal to 0. This gives us:
[tex]1/4x + 1/2 = 0[/tex]
in your case which has the solution x = -2. Since we know that a parabola has exactly one minimum or maximum point and it's differentiable at all points we know that this is it so the vertex is at x = -2. Otherwise you could try to complete the square to get:
[tex]y = 1/8(x+2)^2 + 3[/tex]
which shows us that [tex]y\geq 3[/tex] because the square of a real number is non-negative. Hence the vertex is at y= 3 which verifies our answer of (-2,3) for the vertex.

EDIT: Apparently you edited your post while I replied and changed the correct answer to an incorrect answer. In the first formula you omitted ^2, but I expect this is a typo as you remember it in later formulas. After 2 = 16a you should get 1 = 8a which gives a= 1/8 as mathman pointed out, but you somehow got a=8 which is incorrect (16*8 is not 2). Apart from that you should read mathman's reply as his solution is exactly the same.

ya that ^2 was a mistake, i forgot to put it there. Thanks for the help though, your explanation makes things more clearer. Its been a while so i kinda forgot how to do this but your explanation helped me out =).

Also since i changed it to the wrong equation i am guessing i am doing this one wrong as well?

you are given an X coordinate of the vertex in 2, a = -1 and passes through point (3,4)

would the equation be this: y = - x² + 9x - 14?

thanks, help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
cruisx said:
ya that ^2 was a mistake, i forgot to put it there. Thanks for the help though, your explanation makes things more clearer. Its been a while so i kinda forgot how to do this but your explanation helped me out =).

Also since i changed it to the wrong equation i am guessing i am doing this one wrong as well?
You did everything right except for the fact that you at some point got the equation 2= 16a and concluded that a =8. This step is not correct. You should have solved for a and gotten a = 1/8 and inserted that and then you would have gotten the correct answer.

would the equation be this: y = - x² + 9x - 14?

thanks, help would be appreciated.
No. The vertex is at the x-coordinate -9/(2(-1)) = 9/2 which is not 2. In general the vertex has an x-coordinate of -b/2a where b and a are the coefficients of x and x^2.

You are told that the x-coordinate of the vertex is 2 so you know it's of the form:
f(x) = a(x-2)^2 + c
where c is the y-coordinate of the vertex. You are told that a=-1 (I'm assuming that this is what was meant by a) so inserting this we get:
f(x) = -(x-2)^2 + c
Now inserting the point we get:
4 = -(3-2)^2 + c
4 = -(1)^2 + c
4 = -1 + c
c = 5
Thus our function is:
f(x) = -(x-2)^2 + 5
Our in expanded form:
f(x) = -x^2 + 4x + 1
 
Ok thanks =) i will give it a go and see if i get the same answer again. Also just a graphing Question...maybe i am just over analyzing things but.. I have to graph/create a family of functions with the same X coordinate and with the initial function of y = X squared.
so i could graph some thing like this. (0,1) (0,2) (0,3) ? is it that easy? I have never heard of family of functions until today so idk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K