How to determine the wire gauge of thermocouple wires?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate wire gauge for thermocouple wires in a resistance thermometer bridge circuit, specifically addressing the effects of wire resistance on temperature readings. Participants explore the calculations involved in this determination, including the temperature coefficient of resistance and the resistance of the thermometer at various temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents calculations to find the smallest gauge of copper wire needed to keep the indicated maximum temperature below 151°C, using the temperature coefficient of resistance and resistance formulas.
  • Another participant questions the sign of the temperature coefficient and its implications for the resistance values calculated, suggesting there may be inconsistencies in the results.
  • A participant acknowledges a mistake in their formula and attempts to correct it, but further issues are noted regarding the definitions of various resistances in the circuit.
  • Clarifications are requested about the labeling of resistances in the diagram, indicating a need for clearer communication in the calculations.
  • Further calculations are presented, but another participant expresses confusion about how the sensor resistance varies with temperature, particularly regarding the reference temperature and its implications for the calculations.
  • Discussion includes a suggestion to consult a textbook for a clearer explanation of the temperature coefficient and its application in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and the interpretation of the temperature coefficient of resistance. There is no consensus on the correctness of the calculations or the underlying assumptions, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the definitions of terms used in the calculations, the reference temperatures, and the implications of the temperature coefficient of resistance. These aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

Offline1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A resistance thermometer bridge circuit shown below has a
designed maximum temperature of 150°C, ignoring the effects of
connecting wire resistance. If the connecting loop is 200 m
determine the smallest gauge (swg) of copper wire which must be
used if the indicated maximum temperature is to be less than 151°C.
The temperature coefficient of resistance of the thermometer is
0.0052 °C–1 and the resistance of the thermometer is 100 at 20°C.
Assume the connecting leads are at 20°C.

upload_2018-2-24_9-33-55.png


Homework Equations

.

[/B]
Rt = R0(1 + at)

R1RT = R2RS

R = pL/A = Resistance = (Resistivity) x Length of wire / cross-sectional area

A = (pi x d2) / 4

d = squareroot(4A /pi)

The Attempt at a Solution

.

[/B]
R0 = Rt /(1 + at)

R0 = 100 /(1 + 0.0052 x 20) = 90.58 ohms

R150 = 90.58 /(1 + 0.0052 x 150) = 50.89 ohms

Fundamental Interval = Rt - R0 = 90.58 - 50.89 = 39.69 ohms = RS

R1RT = R2RS

RT = R2RS / R1 = 150 x 39.69 / 150 = 39.69 ohms

R = pL/A

A = pL/R = (0.0000000168 x 200) / 39.69 = 0.00000336 m2 = 3.36 mm2

d = squareroot(4A /pi) = squareroot(4 x 3.36 / pi) = 4.27mm = 7 swg.

Please let me know if I am in the right direction on this, it's been puzzling me for a few days now!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-24_9-33-55.png
    upload_2018-2-24_9-33-55.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 1,173
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the temperature coefficient positive or negative?
Offline1 said:
The temperature coefficient of resistance of the thermometer is
0.0052 °C–1

Offline1 said:
the resistance of the thermometer is 100 at 20°C

Is this result consistent with your answer to my first question, above?
Offline1 said:
R150 = 90.58 /(1 + 0.0052 x 150) = 50.89 ohms

So far I've only glanced at your work, there may be other issues lurking there.
 
I've just noticed that I've put a \ in this formula: RT = R0 x (1 + at), sorry!
 
No need to apologize to me, it's your problem. By the way, there are other issues.
How are R1, R2, RS, RT defined, which one is which in the diagram? It's hard to follow your work without knowing what's what.
I suggest you redo 3. The attempt... section with your above modifications, being careful to include all of the terms in the equations when calculating.

Overall, your original post is nicely laid out and easily readable, I wish they all were.

Tom
 
OK my second attempt.. as for the labelling of the diagram top left is R1, Top right is RS, Bottom left is R2 & Bottom Right is RT.

Rt = R0(1 + at)

R0 = 100 (1 + 0.0052 x 20) = 110.4 ohms

R150 = 110.4(1 + 0.0052 x 150) = 196.5 ohms

Fundamental Interval = Rt - R0 = 196.5 - 110.4 = 86.1 ohms = RS

R1RT = R2RS

RT = R2RS / R1 = 150 x 86.1 / 150 = 86.1 ohms

R = pL/A

A = pL/R = (0.0000000168 x 200) / 86.1 = 0.0000000039 m2 = 0.0039 mm2

d = squareroot(4A /pi) = squareroot(4 x 0.0039/ pi) = 0.07mm = 45 swg
 
Offline1 said:
The temperature coefficient of resistance of the thermometer is
0.0052 °C–1 and the resistance of the thermometer is 100 at 20°C.
Offline1 said:
Rt = R0(1 + at)

R0 = 100 (1 + 0.0052 x 20) = 110.4 ohms

R150 = 110.4(1 + 0.0052 x 150) = 196.5 ohms
There still seems a bit of trouble with how the sensor resistance varies with temperature. With the temperature coefficient being positive, I have trouble seeing how the resistance can be higher at 0°C than it is at 20°C.

Lets start with Rt, with Rt being the resistance at the working (final) temperature,
R0 the resistance at the Reference temperature,
T0 the Reference temperature,
T1 the working (final) temperature.
α is the temperature coefficient of resistance.

The full formula for this problem at least, is:
Rt = R0 * ( 1+ α(T1-T0))

I can see why you took R0 to be the 0°C resistance, but in engineering the form "T0" (that is "VARIABLEsub<zero>") is usually taken as the Reference value or Initial value; that is, the value that "VARIABLEsub<something else>" is referred to. Yeah, confusing!

Look up the formula in your textbook; there may be a clearer explanation than the above to help you wrap your brain around it.

And we shall continue.

Tom
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K