How to evaluate this summation

  • Thread starter Thread starter atchoh1983
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
atchoh1983
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello guys,

I have tried to evaluate \Sigma e-an2 so many times, but I didn't get it.

where a is just a constant and summation begin from n=1 to infinity.

I know that \Sigmaen is just geometric series which is equal 1/(1-e)

But when n changes to be n2, I have no ideas how to do that.

If anyone know, please give me a suggestion.

with much thanks and appreciate!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Im not sure, but I really don't think you can express

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-an^2}

in closed form. But if you meant

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(e^{-an})^2

you can just do the following steps

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(e^{-an})^2 = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-2an} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(e^{2a})^{-n} = \frac 1{e^{2n}-1}
 
This is an elliptic theta function, see Handboook of Mathematical Functions by Milton Abramowitz and Irene Stegun, p. 576, 16.27.3 (Put z=1 and q=exp(-a).)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top