How to Expand Finite Series in a Shorter Form?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the expansion of the finite series represented by the expression (\sum_{j=1}^{n}(X(t_j)-X(t_{j-1}))^2 - t)^2 into a more manageable form. Participants clarify that the correct expansion involves terms such as (\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_j)^4 + 2*\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of finite series and summation notation
  • Familiarity with statistical notation and expectations
  • Knowledge of variance and covariance in statistical contexts
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical manipulation of series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of variance and covariance in statistics
  • Learn about the manipulation of summation notation in mathematical proofs
  • Explore examples of finite series expansions in mathematical literature
  • Practice expanding complex expressions using summation identities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students studying advanced calculus or statistical theory who are looking to deepen their understanding of finite series expansions and their applications.

JulmaJuha
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello :blushing:

How to do expand this: (\sum_{j=1}^{n}(X(t_j)-X(t_{j-1}))^2 - t)^2 where X(t_j)-X(t_{j-1}) = \Delta X_j

to this: (\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_j)^4 + 2*\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j<i}^{ }(\Delta X_i)^2(\Delta X_j)^2 -2*t*\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_j)^2+t^2I get near the North Pole... but it seems that I've forgotten some fundamental rules of finite series to do the last part of the manipulation :smile:.I assume that the blue part has to be expaned further. This is what I've done:

\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_i)^2 = a,t=b

E[(a-b)^2]=E[a^2-2ab+b^2]=E[\color{blue} {(\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X)^2)^2} \color{black} -2*t*\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X)^2+t^2]

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I may be misunderstanding something, but I think the second term (with the double sum in i and j) should be multiplied by 2. Either that or the sum in j should be over j \neq i rather than j<i.

Anyway, you are correct to say that the blue term needs to be expanded further. Just try writing out one explicit example, say for n=2. Often, the compact summation notation obscures otherwise obvious patterns.

Also, you can use ( \sum_j f_j )^2 = ( \sum_j f_j ) ( \sum_i f_i ).
 
krome you're correct, its supposed to be multiplied by 2
 
JulmaJuha said:
krome you're correct, its supposed to be multiplied by 2

No, it should not be multiplied by 2. If ##a_i = (\Delta X_i)^2##, you have to expand the sum
\left(\sum_i (a_i-t)\right)^2 = \left( \sum_i a_i - nt \right)^2 <br /> = \sum_i a_i^2 + 2\sum_{i&lt;j} a_i a_j - 2nt \sum_i a_i + n^2 t^2.
 
JulmaJuha said:
(\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_j)^4 + 2*\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j&lt;i}^{ }(\Delta X_i)^2(\Delta X_j)^2 -2*t*\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Delta X_j)^2+t^2

Good lord! I must be going mad or selectively blind. I swear when I read this last night the second term did not have a factor of 2! :confused:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K