I How to explain the strange pulsar in the Crab Nebula?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Line_112
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the pulsar in the Crab Nebula, which is typically understood as a non-accreting neutron star emitting excess X-ray radiation due to its youth and high temperature. Observations show a vortex of gas around the pulsar and a cone of radiation directed away from Earth, raising questions about traditional models of pulsar radiation. The conventional view suggests that radiation from accretion flows in a cone from the magnetic poles, but the observed alignment contradicts this. Participants debate the implications of these observations, with some suggesting that conclusions drawn from images may be overly speculative. The thread was ultimately closed after the original question was deemed answered.
Line_112
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
According to generally accepted ideas, the pulsar in the Crab Nebula is a single non-accreting neutron star, and the excess of X-ray radiation in its spectrum is explained by its young age and high surface temperature. However, in the X-ray photo of the Crab Nebula, a vortex of gas around the pulsar is clearly visible. Moreover, a cone of radiation is visible coming out of the pulsar in the center of the vortex, which is directed far from our direction.
According to generally accepted ideas, the pulsar in the Crab Nebula is a single non-accreting neutron star, and the excess of X-ray radiation in its spectrum is explained by its young age and high surface temperature. However, in the X-ray photo of the Crab Nebula, a vortex of gas around the pulsar is clearly visible. Moreover, a cone of radiation is visible coming out of the pulsar in the center of the vortex, which is directed far from our direction.
According to generally accepted ideas, radiation from gas accretion onto a neutron star spreads in the form of a cone from magnetic poles, to which the accreted matter flows down in the form of a vortex. We see this scheme in the X-ray photo of the pulsar.
In this case, accretion is a random additional phenomenon that showed where the perpendicular from the magnetic pole of the emitting object is directed.
And it is not directed at us, which probably contradicts the generally accepted ideas about the radiation of pulsars (including radio pulsars, of which this pulsar is believed to be a predecessor).

What do you feel about it?
 

Attachments

  • Пульсар в Крабюовидной туманности.webp
    Пульсар в Крабюовидной туманности.webp
    18.3 KB · Views: 10
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Isn't the magnetic dipole perpendicular to its rotation axis?
Or what exactly is your question?
 
It's a pulsar wind nebula, with shock waves and a jet aligned with rotation axis. Not a vortex or a cone of radiation of the type that is producing the pulses.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05184

Line_112 said:
What do you feel about it?
I feel that, once again, you're trying to form far reaching conclusions based on how a blurry picture looks to you.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, PeterDonis, Motore and 3 others
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
The question in the original post has been answered, so this thread will remain closed.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top