Why are continuously emitting radio pulsars not detected?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

No continuously emitting radio pulsars have been discovered, with a detection probability of approximately 1 in 100 when the magnetic pole aligns with the geographic pole. The discussion concludes that pulsar radiation is likely not related to rotation but rather to the intrinsic periodicity of the radiation itself. The presence of intermediate low-amplitude pulses suggests oscillation rather than rotation. Furthermore, the consensus is that steady radio neutron stars have not been identified, and the characteristics of pulsar emissions remain distinct from non-pulsating astronomical sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pulsar mechanics and radiation patterns
  • Familiarity with radio astronomy and detection methods
  • Knowledge of neutron star characteristics and classifications
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic radiation and coherence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between pulsars and non-pulsating neutron stars
  • Investigate the mechanisms behind pulsar radiation and its periodicity
  • Explore the role of magnetic fields in neutron stars and their emissions
  • Learn about the detection techniques used in radio astronomy for identifying celestial sources
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in the study of neutron stars, pulsars, and radio emissions in the universe.

  • #31
Ken G said:
It might still be possible in the time domain, however. I think what you'd look for is a nearly continuous but still periodically varying source, as if the beam was nearly, but not exactly, aligned with the rotation axis.
A pulsar is a noise source that pulses in a noisier background. The detected signal from the brightest pulsar, fed in real time to an amplifier and speaker, can just be heard in the background noise.

Given sufficient time, you can gather data with about a 2 kHz BW, then FFT, and Power Spectrum Accumulate, deep into the noise, to see what is hidden in there. If you find a blip in the PS, you can run it again on the same patch of sky, to see if it is still there, and repeatable. Once you have an idea of the pulse rate, you can take longer time samples, to get better estimates of the rate. You can then accumulate power in a circular time buffer, to see the shape of the pulse. But what if the pulse is an almost flat sinusoid?

Either you have reliably detected a pulsar, and measured its period, or you have not. I see no way to tell the difference between a dim pulsar in noise, a pulsar being seen side-on in noise, or one almost end-on in noise.

The search for the pulsar with the flattest sinusoidal pulse, will take forever, and cannot resolve any question.

Observatory time is expensive. There is little point in investing the huge amount of observation time, needed to dig the smallest signals out of noise, if those signals are so small, that they cannot be categorised meaningfully.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Motore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
844
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
725
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K