Surprising Gamma Rays From Crab Nebula

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the recent detection of gamma rays from the Crab Pulsar at energies exceeding 100 gigaelectronvolts, which challenges existing models of pulsar emissions. Participants explore the implications of these findings for theoretical frameworks in astrophysics and the potential need for new observational strategies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the detection of high-energy gamma rays from the Crab Pulsar suggests current pulsar models are incomplete, as stated by researchers involved in the study.
  • One participant highlights that the findings contradict previous expectations, with theorists previously believing such energetic gamma-ray pulses would not be observed.
  • Another participant proposes a hypothesis involving Type II supernova explosions and the production of baryogenic antimatter as a possible explanation for the observed emissions.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the media's portrayal of the findings, suggesting that the dramatic framing may not accurately reflect the scientific context and uncertainties surrounding pulsar magnetospheres.
  • A later reply questions the assertion that theorists categorically ruled out the possibility of such high-energy emissions, arguing that the complexities of pulsar magnetospheres make definitive statements difficult.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the findings indicate limitations in current pulsar models, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of these results and the extent to which they challenge existing theories. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the interpretation of the data and its significance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the understanding of pulsar magnetospheres is still developing, and there are unresolved questions regarding the mechanisms behind the observed gamma-ray emissions. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and hypotheses without reaching a consensus.

Dotini
Gold Member
Messages
639
Reaction score
230
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15203788
Astronomers have spotted gamma ray emissions coming from the Crab Pulsar at far higher energies than expected.

This challenges notions of how these powerful electromagnetic rays - like light, but far more energetic - are formed, researchers suggest in Science.

They found emissions at more than 100 gigaelectronvolts - 100 billion times more energetic than visible light.


http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6052/69
Abstract

We report the detection of pulsed gamma rays from the Crab pulsar at energies above 100 giga–electron volts (GeV) with the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) array of atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. The detection cannot be explained on the basis of current pulsar models. The photon spectrum of pulsed emission between 100 mega–electron volts and 400 GeV is described by a broken power law that is statistically preferred over a power law with an exponential cutoff. It is unlikely that the observation can be explained by invoking curvature radiation as the origin of the observed gamma rays above 100 GeV. Our findings require that these gamma rays be produced more than 10 stellar radii from the neutron star.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The findings reveal that current models of pulsars are, at a minimum, incomplete. Speaking to this fact, The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory's Martin Schroedte, who performed most of the analytical work for the study, said :

If you asked theorists a year ago whether we would see gamma-ray pulses this energetic, almost all of them would have said, "No." There's just no theory that can account for what we've found.
The researchers explore several scenarios that could explain the unprecedented observations in a paper published in today's issue of Science, but ultimately conclude that more observations — possibly requiring next-generation observatory equipment — will be necessary before any new pulsar models can be drawn up.

For now, astronomers are left to ruminate on the game-changing results of an experiment that many thought should never have been performed.

"To me it's a real triumph of the experimental approach, not going along with the flow and making assumptions, but just observing to see what there is," said astronomer Rene Ong, spokesperson for the VERITAS gamma ray observatory that was used to detect the Crab Pulsar's radiation.

"And lo and behold, we see something different than what everybody expected."


http://io9.com/nepomuk-otte/

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Wow that's a huge amount of energy...
 
250px-Crab_Nebula.jpg

Wikipedia said:
the Crab is generally the strongest persistent source in the sky, with measured flux extending to above 10^12 eV.

It may be possible that Type II supernova explosions above 9 solar masses produce baryogenic anti-proton and anti-neutron antimatter residue, as a result of the stellar core shock wave rebounding at near luminous velocity. This could also explain the missing matter and the measured flux, if a matter-antimatter contributing event occurred during the stellar core shock wave rebound.
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_Nebula"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that we have an example of *OH MY FREAKING WORD-ism* by popular press. The press loves to make things dramatic and breathlessly interesting.

Dotini said:
The findings reveal that current models of pulsars are, at a minimum, incomplete.


Which is something that we already new. There is a lot we don't understand about the magnetic fields of pulsars.

If you asked theorists a year ago whether we would see gamma-ray pulses this energetic, almost all of them would have said, "No."

I don't think that's true. Since pulsar magnetospheres are not very well understood, it's very hard to say categorically that something can't happen. Having extremely high energy gamma rays is interesting, but it's not totally unexpected.

Here is the original paper

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1108/1108.3797.pdf

This is before you to through the *OH MY FREAKING WORD* filter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K